Fasting Insulin Levels and Cognitive Decline in Older Women without Diabetesvan Oijen M.a · Okereke O.I.b, c · Kang J.H.c · Pollak M.N.f · Hu F.B.c, e · Hankinson S.E.c, d · Grodstein F.b-d
aDepartments of Epidemiology/Biostatistics and Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; bDivision of Aging and cChanning Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, dDepartments of Epidemiology and eNutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass., USA; fDepartments of Medicine and Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute of the Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Que., Canada
Dr. Francine Grodstein
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02115 (USA)
Tel. +1 617 525 2279, Fax +1 617 525 2008, E-Mail email@example.com
Do you have an account?
Background: Type 2 diabetes has been associated with an increased risk of dementia. To assess possible independent effects of insulin, we investigated the relation of insulin levels to cognitive decline in nondiabetic women. Methods: Fasting plasma insulin levels were measured in mid-life in 1,416 nondiabetic Nurses’ Health Study participants, who also completed cognitive testing that began 10 years later (current age: 70–75 years). Over 4 years, 3 assessments of general cognition, verbal memory, category fluency and attention were administered. Primary outcomes were the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) performance, the global score (average of all tests) and verbal memory (average of verbal recall tests). Linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate the association between insulin and cognitive decline. Results: Higher insulin levels were associated with a faster decline on the TICS and verbal memory. For analysis, batch-specific quartiles of insulin levels were constructed. Compared to the lowest quartile, adjusted differences in the annual rates of decline (with 95% CI values in parentheses) for the second, third and fourth quartiles were: TICS, –0.06 (–0.16, 0.03), –0.14 (–0.24, –0.04), and –0.09 (–0.19, 0.01) points (p trend = 0.04); verbal memory, –0.01 (–0.04, 0.02), –0.05 (–0.08, –0.02), and –0.02 (–0.05, 0.01) units (p trend = 0.02). These associations remained after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for a potential role of higher fasting insulin levels in cognitive decline, possibly independent of diabetes.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.