Intralymphatic Injections as a New Administration Route for Allergen-Specific ImmunotherapyMartínez-Gómez J.M.a · Johansen P.a · Erdmann I.a · Senti G.a · Crameri R.b · Kündig T.M.a
aUnit for Experimental Immunotherapy, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, and bSwiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Davos, Switzerland
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: IgE-mediated allergy can be treated by subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT). However, the percentage of allergic patients undergoing SIT is low, mainly due to the long duration of the therapy and the risk of severe systemic allergic reactions associated with the allergen administration. To improve the safety and attractiveness of SIT for patients, alternative routes of allergen administration are being explored, such as sub-lingual or oral administration. Methods: The present study evaluated direct intralymphatic allergen administration as a means to enhance SIT with bee venom and cat fur allergens in mice. Allergen-specific antibody and T-cell responses were analysed by ELISA and flow cytometry. The therapeutic potential of intralymphatic immunisation in sensitised mice was analysed using an anaphylaxis model. Results: Direct injection of the major bee venom allergen phospholipase A2 or the major cat fur allergen Fel d 1 into inguinal lymph nodes enhanced allergen-specific IgG and T-cell responses when compared with subcutaneous injections. Moreover, only intralymphatic immunisation stimulated the production of the Th1-dependent subclass IgG2a, which is associated with improved protection against allergen-induced anaphylaxis. Biodistribution studies showed that injection into the lymph node delivered antigen more efficiently to subcutaneous lymph nodes than subcutaneous injection. Conclusions: As intralymphatic immunisation induced more than 10-fold higher IgG2a responses with 100-fold lower allergen doses than subcutaneous immunisation, this approach should allow to reduce both the number of allergen injections as well as the allergen dose, improving both efficacy and safety of SIT.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.