For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
Pancreatic Function in Carboxyl-Ester Lipase Knockout MiceVesterhus M.a, c, f · Ræder H.a, c, f · Kurpad A.J.e · Kawamori D.e · Molven A.b, d · Kulkarni R.N.e · Kahn C.R.f · Njølstad P.R.a, c, f
Departments of aPediatrics and bPathology, Haukeland University Hospital, cDepartment of Clinical Medicine and dThe Gade Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Sections on eCell and Molecular Physiology and fObesity, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA Corresponding Author
Prof. Pål Rasmus Njølstad, MD, PhD
Section for Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen NO–5020 Bergen (Norway)
Tel. +47 5597 5200, Fax +47 5597 5159
Background/Aims:CEL-MODY is a monogenic form of diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to mutations in the carboxyl-ester lipase (CEL) gene. We aimed to investigate endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function in CEL knockout mice (CELKO). Methods: A knockout mouse model with global targeted deletion of CEL was investigated physiologically and histopathologically, and compared to littermate control CEL+/+ mice at 7 and 12 months on normal chow and high-fat diets (HFD), i.e. 42 and 60% fat by calories. Results: CELKO+/+ and –/– mice showed normal growth and development and normal glucose metabolism on a chow diet. Female CEL–/– mice on 60% HFD, on the other hand, had increased random blood glucose compared to littermate controls (p = 0.02), and this was accompanied by a reduction in glucose tolerance that did not reach statistical significance. In these mice there was also islet hyperplasia, however, α- and β-islet cells appeared morphologically normal and pancreatic exocrine function was also normal. Conclusion: Although we observed mild glucose intolerance in female mice with whole-body knockout of CEL, the full phenotype of human CEL-MODY was not reproduced, suggesting that the pathogenic mechanisms involved are more complex than a simple loss of CEL function.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP
Over the past decade, the study of monogenic forms of diabetes has revealed important new insights into mechanisms of normal β-cell function and β-cell dysfunction, and has facilitated new treatment strategies as in certain cases of neonatal diabetes [1,2]. Some monogenic mutations in which the disrupted gene seems to affect the progenitor cells for both the endocrine and exocrine cells cause diabetes associated with pancreatic exocrine dysfunction [3,4,5,6]. Recently, we have identified a new form of monogenic diabetes (CEL-MODY; MODY: maturity-onset diabetes of the young), characterized by β-cell dysfunction, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and mutations in the carboxyl-ester lipase (CEL) gene, which appear to affect the functional enzyme by decreased stability and secretion in vitro. CEL expression in acinar cells but not in islets of healthy C57BL mice has been shown by immunohistochemistry . CEL has broad substrate specificity and hydrolyzes mono-, di-, and triacylglycerols, but also cholesteryl and retinyl esters and lysophosphatidylglycerols, and has been referred to by a number of names such as bile-salt-dependent lipase, carboxyl ester hydrolase, cholesterol ester hydrolase, cholesterol esterase, sterol ester hydrolase, phospholipase A1. Human pancreatic juice has been demonstrated to sometimes contain isoforms of pancreatic CEL of two different molecular weights, proposed to correspond to heterozygosity for VNTR length. Incomplete glycosylation of the PEST sequences encoded by the VNTR is a less likely explanation, as glycosylation has been shown to be important to CEL secretion . Previous studies of the CEL knockout mouse model (CELKO) have revealed impaired intestinal absorption of esterified cholesterol [10,11] as well as a significant reduction in the number of chylomicrons and size of the intestinal lipoproteins . In the present study, we have further characterized the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic phenotype of this model.
Previously described CELKO mice  were rederived by embryo transfer and kindly provided by Dr. Laurence Panicot, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass., USA. All mice were on a 129Sv-C57BL/6-FVB mixed genetic background, so for all experiments littermates were used as controls. The animals were kept on a 12 h light, 12 h dark cycle and fed a standard rodent chow (Mouse Diet 9F; Taconic Farms, Germantown, N.Y., USA) ad libitum unless otherwise indicated. In the high-fat diet (HFD) experiments, the mice were fed either a 42% fat by calories diet (TD 88137; Harlan Teklad, Madison, Wisc., USA) or a 60% fat by calories diet (D12492; Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, N.J., USA). Heterozygous mice (CEL+/–) were used for breeding. The experimental groups consisted of homozygous knockout mice (CEL–/–) compared to littermate controls (CEL+/+) referred to as WT (wild-type). Genotyping was performed by PCR using genomic DNA isolated from tail snips. One downstream and two upstream primers for CEL were synthesized to differentiate WT, heterozygous, and homozygous knockout mice. The upstream primer UP-WT (5′ TCG TGG AGG GCG TCA ACA 3′), and the downstream primer DOWN (5′ CCC AAG GGT CCA ACA CGG TA 3′), amplify a 744-bp fragment of the WT CEL gene. The upstream primer UP-KO (in the neo gene; 5′ CTG CAC GAC GCG AGC TG 3′) and primer DOWN amplify a 608-bp fragment of the disrupted CEL. Thus, a single band of 608 bp was scored as disruption of both CEL alleles, i.e. a CELKO mouse. All protocols for animal use and euthanasia were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of the Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines or, for studies conducted in Norway, by the Norwegian Research Animal Care Committee in accordance with the Norwegian Animal Welfare Act.
The investigations of chow-fed mice at 7 months included 4 mice in each group, and investigations at 12 months included males [n = 3 CEL–/–, 4 WT] and females [n = 8 CEL–/–, 7 WT]. For the high-fat challenges, we used HFDs consisting of either 42.0% fat, 42.7% carbohydrate and 15.3% protein (% of kcal) (‘42% HFD’; males [n = 5 CEL–/–, 5 WT] and females [n = 5 CEL–/–, 5 WT], 9 months old at baseline) or 60.0% fat, 20% carbohydrate and 20% protein (% of kcal) (‘60% HFD’; males [n = 8 (CEL–/–), 10 WT] and females [n = 7 CEL–/–, 7 WT], 14 weeks old at baseline). The mice were fed the diets for 12 weeks prior to physiological testing and for 16 weeks prior to morphological studies.
We measured fed and fasting blood glucose levels by a Glucometer Elite (Bayer Health Care, Tarrytown, N.Y., USA) using blood from tail snips. For other analyses, blood was collected in chilled heparinized tubes and centrifuged (5–10 min at 5,000 rpm) and the supernatants were collected and stored at –20°C. Plasma insulin and glucagon levels were measured by ELISA using mouse insulin and glucagon standards, respectively (Crystal Chem Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). We measured blood glucose and plasma insulin levels in the random-fed state between 8:30 and 11:00 a.m. or in the morning after a 14- to 16-hour overnight fast. Serum triglyceride levels were measured by colorimetric enzyme assay (GPO-Trinder Assay; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA). Free fatty acid levels were measured using the NEFA-Kit-U (Amano Enzyme, Osaka, Japan). We measured serum amylase by an enzyme assay (Raichem, San Diego, Calif., USA).
For glucose tolerance tests (GTTs), mice were fasted overnight (14 h) then injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with glucose (2 g/kg body weight [b.w.]). Tail vein blood glucose was measured as described above at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after injection. For insulin tolerance tests (ITTs), fed mice were injected i.p. with insulin (1 U/kg b.w. for females, 1.5 U/kg b.w. for males; Humulin, Lilly, Indianapolis, Ind., USA), and tail vein blood glucose was measured 0, 15, 30, and 60 min after injection. We performed stimulated acute-phase insulin secretion tests after an overnight fast (14 h). Tail vein blood glucose was measured and blood for insulin analyses collected and treated as described above at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min after an i.p. injection of either glucose (3 g/kg b.w.; GSIS) or a combination of glucose in the same dose as above and arginine (0.3 g/kg b.w., Arg-GSIS).
Fat malabsorption was measured by a previously described method by comparing the fecal excretion of fat and the non-absorbable dietary marker sucrose polybehenate to the ratio of behenic acid to other dietary fatty acids, using gas chromatography analysis as previously described . We analyzed the enzymatic activity of elastase in mouse feces by fluorometry as described by Zenker et al. .
Islets were obtained by collagenase digestion as previously described  and were maintained in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 7 mM glucose and 10% v/v FCS. After overnight incubation, gene expression studies were performed in healthy handpicked islets. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif., USA) and cDNA was generated by reverse transcriptional DNA synthesis (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA). Gene expression for mouse CEL, glucagon, insulin, glut-2, PDX-1, MafA, Neuro-D1 and amylase was determined by qRT-PCR  using appropriate primers (sequences available on request), and normalized for β-actin.
Weight and blood glucose levels were decided in fed mice before they were anesthetized and exsanguinated. Blood was collected and prepared as described above. The pancreas was rapidly dissected and divided into two or three parts. Pancreatic samples to be studied by light microscopy were weighed, fixed in pre-chilled zinc-formalin (Z-Fix), then paraffin-embedded, sectioned, hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained, and examined by direct microscopy. We measured islet area in all islets in one section from each pancreatic sample using the ColorView Soft Imaging System. Other sections were prepared by immunohistochemical staining for amylase or triple immunostaining for insulin, glucagon and somatostatin. Liver and epididymal fat samples were fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin-embedded, sectioned and HE-stained. Other liver sections were treated with periodic acid-Schiff reagent for immunohistochemical staining of glycogen using standard protocols. For lipid staining, liver and pancreas samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen or embedded in OCT 4853 (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Japan) and frozen on dry ice, cross-sectioned at –30°C and stained for lipids with Oil-red-O (Polyscientific, Gaithersburg, Md., USA). Tissue samples for protein extraction were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C, while samples for RNA extraction were either directly homogenized in tissue lysis buffer (pancreas), put in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, Tex., USA) (liver) or snap-frozen (other tissues) and then stored briefly at –80°C.
Immunohistochemical analyses of pancreas sections were performed as previously described . Antibodies to the following proteins were used: amylase (# sc-12821; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif., USA, and donkey anti-goat cy2-conjugated secondary antibody; Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Me., USA), insulin (# 4011-01; Linco Research, St. Charles, Mo., USA, and donkey anti-guinea pig-Texas red secondary antibody, Jackson Labs), glucagon (# G2654; Sigma, and donkey anti-mouse-Texas red secondary antibody; Jackson Labs), and somatostatin (# n1551; Dako, and donkey anti-rabbit cy2-conjugated secondary antibody; Jackson Labs).
We employed two-tailed Student’s t tests of independent groups with assumption of unequal variances and a significance level of 5%. For the GTTs, we also performed analyses of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, using baseline measurements as a covariate. Due to non-normal distribution, we used the Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons of the islet area. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS.
CELKO mice were genotyped by PCR as described in Methods, and qRT-PCR of pancreas confirmed the absence of CEL expression in the CELKO mice (fig. 1). CEL+/+, +/– and –/– mice showed normal weight development, lifespan and behavior. When compared to gender-matched controls, CELKO mice showed no weight difference on both normal chow (21.6% fat by calories) and 42 and 60% HFDs (fig. 2a).
When placed on a 60% HFD, CEL–/– mice gained weight in a similar fashion to controls. Over a 12-week period, males increased their body weights by 69.4 (CEL–/–) and 70.3% (WT), respectively, while females had 78.0 and 55.0% weight gain, respectively (fig. 2b). Random fed blood glucose levels were mildly, but statistically significantly higher in female CEL–/– mice compared to WT controls (146 ± 3 mg/dl [CEL–/–] and 126 ± 3 mg/dl [WT], p = 0.002; fig. 2c), but not in males. Male mice fed the 60% HFD for 12 weeks had increased random fed glucose values compared to age-matched mice on chow diet (189 ± 12 vs. 130 ± 1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004 [CEL–/–], and 214 ± 36 vs. 131 ± 17 mg/dl, p = 0.02 [WT]; fig. 2c). WT females fed the 60% HFD for 12 weeks also had increased random fed glucose values compared to age-matched mice on chow diet (151 ± 8 vs. 110 ± 1 mg/dl, p = 0.004). Compared to controls, female CEL–/– mice appeared to have decreased glucose tolerance on both normal chow and on the 42 and 60% HFDs (fig. 3); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Surprisingly, male CEL–/– mice on the 42% HFD had somewhat better glucose tolerance than controls, with a 32% reduction in the area under the curve (p = 0.03). This was confirmed by ANOVA for repeated measures (F = 13.456; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in fasting blood glucose for any group (fig. 3), and fasting glucose levels increased after 12 weeks on the 60% HFD compared to baseline in both CEL–/– and control mice (males: +82% [CEL–/–] and +90% [WT]; females: +36% [CEL–/–] and +54% [WT].
Insulin sensitivity as measured by an ITT was normal in female mice on chow diet or after 12 weeks on a 42% HFD (fig. 4a), or 12 weeks on a 60% HFD (fig. 4b) and in 12-month-old males (data not shown). The 60% HFD induced insulin resistance in male mice as measured by the ITT (fig. 4b), but no differences were detected between the genotypes. No statistical differences were observed between CEL–/– and WT mice for fasting plasma insulin levels (data not shown) or random fed plasma insulin levels (fig. 5a). Likewise, the insulin secretory response was not different between CEL–/– females and controls following arginine-enhanced glucose stimulation (fig. 5b, c). Fasting serum leptin values were not significantly different between CEL–/– females and controls after 12 weeks on the 42% HFD (19.9 ± 7.7 and 14.1 ± 9.6, respectively).
CEL–/– females showed a trend towards higher random fed plasma glucagon levels compared to controls (69.1 ± 11.4 [CEL–/–, n = 3] and 36.9 ± 11.2 [wt, n = 2]; p = 0.07), which was supported by a trend towards increased glucagon gene expression in isolated islets as shown by qRT-PCR; however, neither reached statistical significance. By contrast, there were no differences for plasma glucagon between CEL–/– and WT males (plasma glucagon: 40.4 ± 8.2 [CEL–/–, n = 3] and 35.6 ± 5.7 [wt, n = 4]). No differences in expression levels were detected between CEL–/– and WT mice for insulin (Ins-1), the rate-limiting enzyme of glycolysis-glucokinase (GCK), the glucose transporter GLUT-2, or any of the transcription factors tested (PDX-1, Neuro-D1, MafA), as demonstrated by qRT-PCR of RNA extracted from isolated islets from 5 random fed 12-month-old female CEL–/– mice and 5 littermate controls.
CEL participates in the absorption of cholesterol esters, and reduced lipid levels could indicate malabsorption. However, no differences were observed between CEL–/– mice and controls for serum cholesterol, triglycerides or free fatty acids (table 1). Exocrine pancreatic function as assessed by fecal fat absorption, measured as the ratio of excreted sucrose behenate (a dietary marker) to excreted lipids in the stool, was not decreased in CEL–/– mice fed chow or a 42% HFD (table 1). Serum amylase was within the normal range and did not differ between the genotypes on either chow diet or 42% HFD (table 1). Fecal elastase was statistically higher in CEL–/– mice (n = 4) compared to WT controls (n = 6) after the 60% HFD (p = 0.03), whereas no differences were seen in 12-month-old chow-fed mice or in mice fed the 42% HFD.
Morphological analyses of HE-stained pancreas sections revealed no pathology in the acinar tissue, and similar islet size and number between chow-fed CEL–/– mice and controls (fig. 5). For mice fed 60% HFD, islet area was statistically smaller in CEL–/– males compared to WT (22,233 ± 2,730 vs. 35,305 ± 4471 µm2, respectively; p = 0.03), whereas in females the islet area was statistically larger in CEL–/– than in controls (17,837 ± 2,535 vs. 7,659 ± 1,147 µm2, respectively; p = 0.03). Immunostaining using antibodies against insulin, glucagon and somatostatin showed a relatively normal distribution of insulin-secreting β cells and glucagon-secreting α cells. There was no significant inflammation or fatty infiltration in the islets.
Of 3 chow-fed CEL–/– males, 2 had severe fatty infiltration of the liver on histological examination. This is compared to only 1 of 4 WT males, and in the latter, hepatic steatosis was classified as moderate. The steatosis was predominantly microvesicular and centrilobular. Following 16 weeks of a 42% HFD, 4 of 5 CEL–/– males had moderate or severe steatosis, compared to 3 of 5 controls. None of the chow-fed females had any evidence of liver steatosis, but 2 of 5 CEL–/– females showed moderate steatosis after the HFD. Some mice on HFD had a mild to moderate inflammation of the epididymal fat, but there was no difference between the genotypes. Fat cell size seemed similar between groups.
Recently, we described a novel syndrome of pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and exocrine deficiency caused by mutations in the CEL gene . These mutations resulted in reduction in functional enzyme, indicating that loss of function could be part of the molecular mechanism. In order to explore this further, we have studied the CELKO mouse model.
As gender differences in the penetrance of a diabetic phenotype are frequently encountered in mouse models [18,19], we chose to study mice of both sexes. We found no evidence of altered pancreatic endocrine or exocrine function in the mice of either gender fed on a normal, low-fat chow diet through the age of 12 months. The human mutation carriers are not insulin-resistant, and neither were the mice.
To explore this further, we introduced two different HFDs, a common method of studying the interaction between genes and environment in the creation of diabetes and related syndromes. In this case, challenging the mice with a 42% HFD for 12 weeks was insufficient in inducing metabolic changes promoting excessive weight gain or a diabetic phenotype compared to chow diet, nor did it induce insulin resistance. Indeed, leptin values were only minimally elevated in the WT mice fed the 42% HFD compared to WT mice fed normal chow (data not shown). Consequently, it was not surprising that this diet did not provoke or unmask any differences in glucose homeostasis between CEL–/– and control mice.
In contrast, male mice fed a 60% HFD for 12 weeks were significantly heavier than other mice of the same strain at 7 months of age, and were insulin-resistant, although there were no statistical differences between the genotypes. Female CEL–/– mice fed the 60% HFD, on the other hand, developed random fed hyperglycemia compared to 60% HFD controls, despite normal insulin tolerance, suggesting a mild diabetic phenotype. The larger mean islet area of CEL–/– females compared to controls likely indicates compensatory islet hyperplasia. However, analyses at the mRNA level showed no differences in the expression levels for insulin, the glucose transporter GLUT-2, or key transcription factors involved in β-cell growth. Furthermore, the insulin secretory response was similar between genotypes. This is in contrast to findings in humans with CEL-MODY, where mutations in CEL lead to reduced insulin secretion in mutation carriers and promote subsequent development of diabetes . It is possible that the milder phenotype in the CELKO mice is linked to the mixed 129Sv-C57BL/6-FVB genetic background, and that knockout of CEL in another strain might yield more severe impairment of metabolism. It is worth noting that mice with targeted disruption of the insulin receptor and insulin substrate-1 exhibit remarkably different phenotypes when created on a mixed genetic background or backcrossed onto individual in bred strains . A similar scenario was recently observed in mice with a knockout of the uncoupling protein 2 gene . It is also possible that the current study would not have the power to detect a mild phenotype due to low penetrance of the genetic disorder. Thus, it is likely that creating the CEL KO on different inbred strains (e.g. C57BL/6, 129Sv, etc.) will unmask a phenotype that is influenced by one or more modifier genes close to the target locus.
In humans, the pancreatic exocrine disease as demonstrated by fecal elastase seems to precede diabetes, and all mutation carriers with diabetes exhibit steatorrhea. Mutations in CEL also lead to pancreatic lipomatosis in affected subjects [7,22]. None of the mice, however, developed any exocrine dysfunction on either chow or HFD; indeed, fecal elastase was higher in CEL–/– mice than in WT controls on the 60% HFD. The biological relevance of the fecal elastase test may be limited to a binary classification of ‘low’ or ‘normal’ fecal elastase, and may not indicate the degree of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction . There are to our knowledge no generally acknowledged cutoff values for fecal elastase for mice. We suspect that all measured fecal elastase activity levels represent activities within the normal range, and that the observed statistical difference occurred by chance. The morphology of the exocrine pancreas was also normal in CELKO mice at the age of 12 months, and there was no evidence of lipomatosis. A recent report based on studies of pancreatic triglyceride lipase (PTL) and CEL double knockout mice, revealed that disruption of both genes resulted in 40–50% reduction of TAG absorption . PTL appeared to be the more important enzyme for retinyl ester hydrolysis, and CEL seemed likely to be the single enzyme responsible for cholesteryl ester hydrolysis. The study showed no difference in lipid absorption between WT and CEL–/– mice even on a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet. These results indicate that knockout of only CEL in mice might not be expected to result in steatorrhea in the event of an intact lipase function, and that the type of dietary fat might influence whether steatorrhea would occur. We employed two different HFDs, based on milk fat (‘western diet’) and lard, respectively, thus covering a spectrum of fat types expected to coincide with the diets of the human patients with the syndrome, who do display clinically significant steatorrhea despite no indications of concomitant disruption of the lipase gene.
CEL is expressed at both the mRNA and protein level in the liver . The secreted enzyme has been suggested to be involved in the metabolism of neutral lipid esters of chylomicrons or chylomicron remnants, but studies have later shown that CEL deficiency in CEL–/– mice had no effect on hepatic uptake of chylomicron-derived retinol esters and did not influence serum levels of retinol or retinol-binding protein . In accordance with previous reports, we observed no difference in serum cholesterol values. There are reports of altered liver function and morphology when the HNF4A gene causing HNF4A-MODY is disrupted [27,28]. Our results demonstrate that male CEL–/– mice on chow as well as on a 42% HFD had a higher incidence of moderate and severe liver steatosis compared to controls, however, the numbers were low and the result should be judged with caution. Otherwise, liver morphology was normal.
It should be noted that whole-gene deletion models such as the CELKO mouse are different from single-base deletions reported in the corresponding human disease. It is therefore possible that the mutation in CEL-MODY gives rise to an altered effect of the mutated gene product, such as retention in the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus during posttranslational modification giving rise to endoplasmic reticulum stress or inflammation. This is supported by the fact that in humans the mutation is inherited dominantly, affected patients being heterozygotes, with one normal and one abnormal copy of CEL. Moreover, many late-onset human phenotypes are not apparent in mice [29,30] and as noted above, the genetic background of the CELKO mouse might obscure the effect of the mutation. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated a striking difference in phenotype when mouse knockouts or transgenics are created on different genetic backgrounds [19,20,31,32].
Furthermore, there are important differences in the CEL gene structure between mouse and man. Mouse Cel is a single-copy gene spanning approximately 7.2 kb. In contrast, the 9,850-bp long human CEL is located in tandem with a pseudogene called CELL (or CELP), and CEL is suggested to have evolved from CELL through gene duplication, following which the original gene has become inactivatedreviewed in . This gene duplication has not occurred in the mouse genome, and thus the human pseudogene (and not CEL) seems to be the equivalent of mouse Cel at the genetic level. In line with this, the most important elements in the promoters for the mouse and the human gene, respectively, are different . The last CEL exon contains a VNTR encoding a highly variable number of repeats; in man, most frequently 16 repeats of 11 amino acids, but repeat numbers from 7 to 21 have been observed. The variability of the VNTR between species is high, with three repeats in mice. It has been clearly demonstrated that truncation of the C-terminal domain does not affect the enzymatic activity of CEL, although the interaction with bile salt may be compromised . In spite of these differences, CEL is expressed at comparable levels in the exocrine pancreas in both mouse and human . However, the differences at the genetic level may indicate that CEL has obtained a somewhat different role in mouse and man throughout evolution, and that the functional overlap with other enzymes may differ. Thus, it is conceivable that the mouse may not be an optimal model for the CEL-MODY syndrome.
In conclusion, whole-body knockout of CEL in mice seems to promote a mild diabetic phenotype in female mice particularly after a 60% high-fat challenge, but did not recapitulate the full phenotype of human CEL- MODY. Most likely, the mechanism of CEL-MODY does not involve a simple loss-of-function effect. It is also possible that the role of CEL varies between species. Further studies are warranted to reveal the pathogenesis. We are currently investigating a transgenic mouse model where we seek to address these questions.
We want to thank Dr. Laurence Panicot, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass., USA, for kindly rederiving and providing us with the CELKO mice, Heike Immervoll for assisting with the assessment of histological sections, and Anita Nordboe, Liv Aasmul and Michael Rourk for practical assistance. This study was supported in part by funds from Haukeland University Hospital, Innovest, The Research Council of Norway, and University of Bergen, Norway, the Fulbright Foundation (to P.R.N.) and an ESPE Sabbatical Leave Programme (to P.R.N.), a Leiv Eiriksson Mobility Grant from The Norwegian Research Council (to M.V.), a Research Fellowship (Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation, Japan; to D.K.), a JDRF Post-doctoral Fellowship (to D.K.) and by National Institutes of Health Grants DK33201 and DK55545, Joslin Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center, Grant 5P30 DK36836 Specialized Assay Core, the Joslin Diabetes Center, Grant DK34834 (to C.R.K.) and RO1 DK 67536 (to R.N.K.).
Prof. Pål Rasmus Njølstad, MD, PhD
Section for Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen NO–5020 Bergen (Norway)
Tel. +47 5597 5200, Fax +47 5597 5159
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.