Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Article

Free Access

Distinctive Phenotypic Abnormalities Associated with Submicroscopic 21q22 Deletion Including DYRK1A

Oegema R.a · de Klein A.a · Verkerk A.J.b · Schot R.a · Dumee B.b · Douben H.a · Eussen B.a · Dubbel L.a · Poddighe P.J.a · van der Laar I.a · Dobyns W.B.c · van der Spek P.J.b · Lequin M.H.d · de Coo I.F.M.e · de Wit M.-C.Y.e · Wessels M.W.a · Mancini G.M.S.a

Author affiliations

Departments of aClinical Genetics and bBioinformatics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; cDepartment of Human Genetics, Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., USA; Departments of dRadiology and eNeurology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author

Grazia M.S. Mancini

Department of Clinical Genetics

Erasmus Medical Center, Postbus Box 2040

NL–3000 CA Rotterdam (The Netherlands)

Tel. +31 10 703 6915, Fax +31 10 704 3072, E-Mail g.mancini@erasmusmc.nl

Related Articles for ""

Mol Syndromol 2010;1:113–120

Abstract

Partial monosomy 21 has been reported, but the phenotypes described are variable with location and size of the deletion. We present 2 patients with a partially overlapping microdeletion of 21q22 and a striking phenotypic resemblance. They both presented with severe psychomotor delay, behavioral problems, no speech, microcephaly, feeding problems with frequent regurgitation, idiopathic thrombocytopenia, obesity, deep set eyes, down turned corners of the mouth, dysplastic ears, and small chin. Brain MRI showed cerebral atrophy mostly evident in frontal and temporal lobes, widened ventricles and thin corpus callosum in both cases, and in one patient evidence of a migration disorder. The first patient also presented with epilepsy and a ventricular septum defect. The second patient had a unilateral Peters anomaly. Microarray analysis showed a partially overlapping microdeletion spanning about 2.5 Mb in the 21q22.1–q22.2 region including the DYRK1A gene and excluding RUNX1. These patients present with a recognizable phenotype specific for this 21q22.1–q22.2 locus. We searched the literature for patients with overlapping deletions including the DYRK1A gene, in order to define other genes responsible for this presentation.

© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel


Keywords

21q2 · Chromosome 21 · DYRK1A · Mental retardation · Microdeletion syndrome · Periventricular nodular heterotopia · Polymicrogyria ·


Introduction

Chromosome 21 has been the subject of extensive studies. Trisomy 21 causing Down syndrome [DS, OMIM #190685] is one of the few trisomy syndromes compatible with life and is common with an incidence of about 1 in 800 live births. However, (partial) monosomy 21 is much rarer and few patients have been reported in literature [Holbek et al., 1974; Fryns et al., 1977; Matsui et al., 1978; Yamamoto et al., 1979; Pellissier et al., 1987; Korenberg et al., 1991; Krasikov et al., 1992; Chettouh et al., 1995; Huret et al., 1995; Theodoropoulos et al., 1995; Bartsch et al., 1997; Joosten et al., 1997; Matsumoto et al., 1997; Ehling et al., 2004; Mori et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2006; Tuschl et al., 2007; Beri-Dexheimer et al., 2008; Dobyns et al., 2008; Lyle et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2009; Fujita et al., 2010; Lindstrand et al., 2010]. The region of the monosomy and the phenotype of reported cases are variable. The 21q22 region seems associated with the most severe phenotype exhibiting mental retardation and microcephaly [Yamamoto et al., 1979]. Disruption of DYRK1A (Drosophila minibrain homologue gene, OMIM *600855) in this region has been associated with microcephaly, mental retardation and dysmorphisms in 2 patients [Møller et al., 2008]. Studying similar patients potentially reveals valuable information regarding the function of the chromosome 21 genes.

We present 2 unrelated individuals with a partial monosomy 21 with strikingly similar facial features giving them a ‘moody’ appearance, similar brain imaging and a partially overlapping 21q22 microdeletion. This overlapping 2.5-Mb region contains amongst others the DYRK1A gene and covers the DS critical region [OMIM #190685]. Combining our data with previously published reports by others, we delineate a recognizable phenotype of chromosome 21q22.1–q22.2 microdeletion including the DYRK1A gene.

Clinical Reports

Patient 1

Patient 1 was referred to our department at 18 months of age. Clinical data are summarized in table 1. He was born after an uneventful pregnancy at 38 weeks of gestation as the 10th child to non-consanguineous healthy Dutch parents. His birth weight was 2,140 g (–2 SD) and head circumference 31 cm (–2.8 SD). The neonatal period was complicated by cardiac decompensation due to a persistent ductus arteriosus and a perimembranous ventricular septum defect (VSD). The duct closed spontaneously at cardiologic follow-up, the VSD was managed conservatively.

Table 1

Summary of patients described in the literature with an 21q22 (micro)deletion including DYRK1A

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236560

Clinical genetic examination at the age of 18 months showed micro- and brachycephaly, square forehead, deep-set eyes with long eyelashes, small nose, large pupils, thin lips with down-turned corners of the mouth, micrognathia, large, low-set ears, and weight and head circumference at –4 SD (fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Facial features of patient 1. A Age unknown. Note the full upper eyelids and cheeks, anteverted nares, down-turned corners of the mouth and large ears. B, C Age 7 years. Note thick eyebrows, full upper eyelids and cheeks, slightly anteverted nares, down-turned corners of the mouth, dental decay and large, low-set ears.

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236558

His developmental milestones were delayed. Severe feeding problems and gastro-esophageal reflux necessitated gastric tube feeding and Nissen fundoplication. He suffered from recurrent upper respiratory tract infections and had severe constipation. He developed epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures requiring antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy.

At follow-up at the age of 7 years he was severely mentally retarded and exhibited no speech. He had a flat forehead, broad eyebrows extending onto the eyelids, deep-set eyes with long eyelashes, large pupils, wide nasal ridge, large, low-set ears, full cheeks, dental caries, micrognathia, small hands and feet, a sandal gap between 1st and 2nd toes, joint hyperlaxity, pectus excavatum, truncal obesity, and cryptorchidism (fig. 1). His height was 110 cm (–3 SD), weight 20 kg (+1 SD), and head circumference 45.5 cm (–4 SD).

Abdominal ultrasound and skeletal X-rays revealed no abnormalities. A post-operative (tonsillectomy) hemorrhage prompted studies of bleeding diathesis, this revealed low platelet counts ranging from 82–149 × 109/l (normal range: 199–369 × 109/l).

Brain MRI performed at 1 year of age (fig. 3A, B) showed small frontal lobes, enlarged lateral and third ventricles with high signal of periventricular white matter on T2 weighted images, a thin corpus callosum and brain stem, and delayed myelination. At two years of age, brain MRI showed similar features, although myelination had progressed.

He died at age 11 of a bronchopneumonia complicated by pulmonary hemorrhage.

Patient 2

Patient 2 was referred to our department of Clinical Genetics at the age of 8 months because of progressive microcephaly and dysmorphic features. She was born after an uneventful pregnancy at 42 weeks of gestation as the first child of non-consanguineous healthy Chinese parents. Her birth weight was 2,765 g (–2 SD), length 46 cm (–3 SD) and head circumference 31 cm (–3.5 SD). She had a systolic murmur due to a persistent ductus arteriosus. It closed spontaneously on follow-up. In infancy she suffered from episodic attacks of blue discoloration of the extremities. She has had two seizures suggestive of epilepsy and one EEG showed dubious epileptic activity, requiring AED therapy.

On clinical examination dysmorphic features included square forehead with nevus flammeus, low-set and thick eyebrows, long eyelashes, peri-orbital fullness with deep set eyes, wide nasal ridge, anteverted nares, down-turned corners of the mouth, small chin, round ears with broad helices and a left-sided ear pit, inverted nipples, a closed sacral dimple, a congenital nevus on the back, a single palmar crease on the left hand, a contracture of the left thumb, deep set nails of the toes, and bilateral short proximally implanted first toes (fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Facial features of patient 2. A Age 8 months. Note the full upper eyelids and cheeks, anteverted nares and down-turned corners of the mouth. B Severe dental decay and malshaped teeth. C, D Age 7 years. Note thick eyebrows, Peters anomaly of the right eye, full upper eyelids and cheeks, anteverted nares and down-turned corners of the mouth, malformed ears and moody expression.

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236557

Her developmental milestones were delayed. She started walking independently at age 2. She suffered from feeding problems which required gastric tube feeding in infancy. During follow-up up to 7 years of age she exhibited severe mental retardation with absent speech, no eye contact, hyperactive behavior and poor interaction with people. Teeth grinding was noted and diffuse dental decay was striking. At that age, her height was 110 cm (–3 SD), weight 25 kg (2.5 SD), and head circumference 48 cm (–2 SD). She had severe constipation.

Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral hypermetropia, amblyopia of the right eye, and a unilateral corneal opacity area consistent with a Peters anomaly. Her platelet counts were below normal range on 2 separate occasions, 104 and 137 × 109/l (normal range: 199–369 × 109/l). Craniosynostosis was excluded with a skull X-ray. Congenital CMV-infection was excluded by PCR of neonatal screening blood spot. No skeletal abnormalities were detected.

Brain MRI performed at the age of 5 months and repeated MRI at the age of 15 months (fig. 3C, D) showed cerebral atrophy with deep sulci, mostly evident in frontal and temporal lobes, underdeveloped frontal gyri, a thin corpus callosum with loss of periventricular white matter and widened lateral and third ventricles both at frontal and occipito-temporal areas, a thin brain stem, and no evidence for active demyelination.

Fig. 3

Brain T1 weighed MRI images. A–D Note cerebral atrophy/underdevelopment of frontal and temporal lobes, widened ventricles including the 3rd ventricle, thin corpus callosum and brain stem. A Patient 1, midsaggital section. B Patient 1, transversal section. C Patient 2, midsagittal section. D Patient 2, transversal section. E, F Patient 2, note periventricular nodular heterotopia and area suspected of polymicrogyria in the right frontal lobe (E). Coronal section (F). Magnification of E, upper arrow points to heterotopia, lower arrow points to the area suspected of polymicrogyria.

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236556

Recent brain MRI at the age of 8 years showed evidence of a periventricular nodular heterotopia located in the frontal horn of the right lateral ventricle. The inferior part of the right frontal cortex is abnormal and suggestive of polymicrogyria (fig. 3E, F).

Cytogenetic and Microarray Results

Routine cytogenetic analysis of patients 1 and 2 revealed a normal karyotype. DNA of the patients was hybridized to Affymetrix 250K SNP arrays according to the Affymetrix standard protocol for the GeneChip Mapping 250K NspI arrays. Copy number analysis using the Copy Number Analyzer for GeneChip (CNAG) v 3.0 [Nannya et al., 2005] indicated in patient 1 a 4.1-Mb deletion (arr 21q22.13–q22.2 (37053718–41102161 [hg18]) ×1, see fig. 4). In patient 2, a 4.2-Mb deletion (arr 21q22.12q22.2 (35337577–39585051 [hg18]) ×1) was observed, (fig. 4). In both cases parental DNA analysis by quantitative PCR showed a de novo origin of the deletion. The deletions were confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome 21 BAC clones (RP11–166F15 absent, RP1–63H24 present). Analysis of the B allele ratio of the Affymetrix array in Nexus Copy Number software (Biodiscovery) revealed the possibility that in patient 1 the deletion was present in mosaic form in leukocyte DNA. Additional FISH analysis confirmed the mosaic in cultured lymphocytes where 50% of the nucleishowed the presence of 2 normal copies of chromosome 21. In order to define the deletion breakpoint in patient 2 more precisely, qPCR experiments were performed on patient DNA (primer sequences available on request). This resulted in refinement of the borders, defining the deletion from basepair 35346296 to 39576472 (NCBI built 36.3), and, using extra- and intragenic probes, RUNX1 was excluded from the proximal end of the deletion.

Fig. 4

Array results. Under the schematic representation of chromosome 21 the actual results in the 21q22.11–q22.3 region of the two 250K SNP arrays are shown. In the bottom panel the overlapping segments and several genes in the area are depicted.

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236555

The deletion areas of the 2 patients partially overlap from base pair 37053718 to 39585051 spanning 2.5 Mb on chromosome 21q22.13–q22.2, encompassing 27 genes (15 protein coding genes, 3 non-protein coding genes, 4 pseudogenes and 5 hypothetical genes) according to the NCBI and Ensembl database annotation build 36.3 (table 2). The DYRK1A gene, previously associated with neurodevelopmental anomalies and microcephaly [Møller et al., 2008], is included in the shared deletion area.

Table 2

Known genes in overlapping deletion area

http://www.karger.com/WebMaterial/ShowPic/236559

Review of 21q22 Deletions Including DYRK1A

Several features have been repeatedly described in partial monosomy 21 including intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation, down-slanting palpebral fissures, low-set ears, arthrogryposis-like signs, hypertonia, heart defect, and mental retardation [Chettouh et al., 1995]. In order to delineate a more specific phenotype relating to 21q22 deletions we searched PubMed, Decipher and Ensembl databases for patients with these deletions. Most of the patients reported in the literature have microscopic deletions with poorly defined breakpoints. We review only those where we can deduce overlap with the 21q22.13–q22.2 critical region of our patients and where the phenotypic description is sufficient for comparison. These are summarized in table 1. The findings are fairly consistent regarding intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR), microcephaly, mental retardation, seizures, corpus callosum abnormalities and facial features (deep-set eyes, micrognathia, and dysplastic ears).

Of note, also one patient described by Shinawi et al. [2008] and one by Yao et al. [2006] show the deletion in mosaic form.

Discussion

The 2 patients presented in this study show a distinctive phenotype that to our knowledge has not previously been recognized in patients with 21q22 deletions. They exhibit severe mental retardation with absence of speech, microcephaly, short stature, and distinct cerebral abnormalities. Their facial features with square forehead, full eyebrows and eyelids, deep-set eyes, broad nasal ridge, and down-turned corners of the mouth are strikingly alike and give them a ‘moody’ appearance. Brain MRI findings are quite similar in the patients, showing underdevelopment of frontal lobes with evidence of a migration disorder in patient 2, deep frontotemporal sulci, large lateral and third ventricles, loss of periventricular white matter, callosal dysgenesis and thin brain stem. The low resolution MRI of patient 1 did not allow recognition of minor cortical malformations.

Because of their resembling features, it is likely that genes in their common deleted area are causative of their phenotype. DYRK1A [OMIM 600855] maps to chromosome 21q22.13 and is included in the deleted area of both patients. With its location within the Down syndrome critical region, DYRK1A has been suggested to play a crucial role in brain alterations both in trisomy and monosomy 21 patients [Song et al., 1996]. Møller et al. [2008] reported 2 patients with a translocation truncating the DYRK1A gene. Both patients exhibited prenatal onset microcephaly, intrauterine growth retardation, feeding problems, developmental delay and seizures. In the first patient retardation was mild, and he had large, low-set ears, long philtrum, and micrognathia. On brain MRI hypogenesis of the corpus callosum was described without other abnormalities. The second patient had severe mental retardation, absent speech, large ears, flat philtrum and a ventricular septum defect. Brain MRI showed enlarged ventricles. The DYRK1A gene is the human homolog of the Drosophila minibrain gene [Tejedor et al., 1995]. It is highly conserved in mammals. In mice, Dyrk1a haploinsuffiency leads to a reduced body size with a disproportionate brain reduction, and developmental delay [Fotaki et al., 2002]. In particular, underdevelopment of the ventral mid- and hindbrain structures was present in Dyrk1A+/– mice. The MRI findings of our patients with large third ventricle, thin corpus callosum and brain stem might relate to the DYRK1A haploinsufficiency.

Besides DYRK1A, there are 14 protein coding and 3 non-protein coding genes annotated in the common deleted area, each of which might contribute to the phenotype. Six of these are Down-syndrome critical region (DSCR) genes of unknown function. Among the genes with known function, TTC3, KCNJ6 and BRDW1 are also interesting candidates.

The TTC3 (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3) gene is involved in neuronal cell differentiation and particularly in regulation of neurite extension [Berto et al., 2007], suggesting that absence of TTC3 could be related to in cognitive problems and brain underdevelopment. The tetratricopeptide domain is also present in kinesins responsible for the organization of axonal microtubules and cytoskeleton dynamics and in KIAA1279, the gene mutated in Goldberg-Shprintzen syndrome [Brooks et al., 2005].

KCNJ6 [OMIM 600877], also known as GIRK2, is expressed in the brain and the pancreatic β-cell. Homozygous Girk2 missense mutation in weaver mice causes severe cerebellar ataxia and altered behavioral pattern [Patil et al., 1995; Pravetoni and Wickman, 2008]. Heterozygous weaver mice have a decreased number of surviving granule cells and suffer sporadically from tonic-clonic seizures [Patil et al., 1995]. Also, homozygous weaver mice have decreased levels of circulating IGF1 and responded to GH-treatment [Yao et al., 2007]. The postnatal growth retardation in our patients might be partially explained by a deficient GH/IGF1 axis, as seen in mutant weaver mice.

Mutations in the RUNX1 gene [OMIM 151385] cause familial platelet disorder with propensity to acute myeloid leukemia [FPD/AML; OMIM 601399]. Shinawi et al. [2008] reviewed platelet pool storage disease caused by RUNX1 haploinsufficiency and described multiple problems of microdeletions at 21q22 ascribed to RUNX1 and DYRK1A. Surprisingly, both our patients were diagnosed with low platelet counts, although RUNX1 is not deleted. Possibly, regulatory elements of RUNX1 are affected by the deletion or other genes in the critical area are involved in platelet disorders. In mice, regulatory elements have been identified distant (300 kb) from Runx1 [Soler et al., 2010].

Periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH) are a new finding in 21q22 deletion. PNH is considered a malformation of cortical development. Of note, other cortical malformations, that is polymicrogyria [Yao et al., 2006; Beri-Dexheimer et al., 2008; Dobyns et al., 2008] and lissencephaly [Miller et al., 2009], have been associated with 21q deletions. Yao et al. [2006] propose that an 8.4-Mb region on 21q22.11–q22.3 is associated with cortical dysplasia. However, the large size of this area and lack of breakpoint details make the comparison of these patients with ours incomplete.

Our findings suggest that a minimum 2.5-Mb microdeletion at chromosome 21q22.13–q22.2 including DYRK1A and excluding RUNX1 is responsible for a characteristic syndrome with recognizable facial features, severe developmental delay, brain abnormalities, IUGR, and eye and platelet abnormalities. Our observation reduces the chromosomal area to which these abnormalities have been previously ascribed, and should encourage high resolution array analysis in patients with a similar phenotype. It could be worthwhile searching for mutations in DYRK1A in patients with a similar phenotype in whom microdeletions have been excluded.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients and their families for their cooperation with this study and R. Koppenol for kindly providing the figures.


References

  1. Bartsch O, Hinkel GK, Petersen MB, Konig U, Bugge M, et al: A large family with subtelomeric translocation t(18;21)(q23;q22.1) and molecular breakpoint in the Down syndrome critical region. Hum Genet 100:669–675 (1997).
  2. Beri-Dexheimer M, Latger-Cannard V, Philippe C, Bonnet C, Chambon P, et al: Clinical phenotype of germline RUNX1 haploinsufficiency: from point mutations to large genomic deletions. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1014– 1018 (2008).
  3. Berto G, Camera P, Fusco C, Imarisio S, Ambrogio C, et al: The Down syndrome critical region protein TTC3 inhibits neuronal differentiation via RhoA and Citron kinase. J Cell Sci 120:1859–1867 (2007).
  4. Brooks AS, Bertoli-Avella AM, Burzynski GM, Breedveld GJ, Osinga J, et al: Homozygous nonsense mutations in KIAA1279 are associated with malformations of the central and enteric nervous systems. Am J Hum Genet 77:120–126 (2005).
  5. Chettouh Z, Croquette MF, Delobel B, Gilgenkrants S, Leonard C, et al: Molecular mapping of 21 features associated with partial monosomy 21: involvement of the APP-SOD1 region. Am J Hum Genet 57:62–71 (1995).
  6. Decipher: https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/application/
  7. Dobyns WB, Mirzaa G, Christian SL, Petras K, Roseberry J, et al: Consistent chromosome abnormalities identify novel polymicrogyria loci in 1p36.3, 2p16.1–p23.1, 4q21.21–q22.1, 6q26–q27, and 21q2. Am J Med Genet A146A:1637–1654 (2008).
    External Resources
  8. Ehling D, Kennerknecht I, Junge A, Prager B, Exeler R, et al: Mild phenotype in two unrelated patients with a partial deletion of 21q22.2–q22.3 defined by FISH and molecular studies. Am J Med Genet A 131:265–272 (2004).
  9. Ensembl: http://www.ensembl.org/
  10. Fotaki V, Dierssen M, Alcantara S, Martinez S, Marti E, et al: Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Mol Cell Biol 22:6636–6647 (2002).
  11. Fryns JP, D’Hondt F, Goddeeris P, van den Berghe H: Full monosomy 21: a clinically recognizable syndrome? Hum Genet 37:155–159 (1977).
  12. Fujita H, Torii C, Kosaki R, Yamaguchi S, Kudoh J, et al: Microdeletion of the Down syndrome critical region at 21q22. Am J Med Genet A152A:950–953 (2010).
    External Resources
  13. Holbek S, Friedrich U, Brostrom K, Petersen GB: Monosomy for the centromeric and juxtacentromeric region of chromosome 21. Humangenetik24:191–195 (1974).
  14. Huret JL, Leonard C, Chery M, Philippe C, Schafei-Benaissa E, et al: Monosomy 21q: two cases of del(21q) and review of the literature. Clin Genet48:140–147 (1995).
  15. Joosten AM, De Vos S, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, Gaillard JL, et al: Full monosomy 21, prenatally diagnosed by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn 17:271–275 (1997).
  16. Korenberg JR, Kalousek DK, Anneren G, Pulst SM, Hall JG, et al: Deletion of chromosome 21 and normal intelligence: molecular definition of the lesion. Hum Genet 87:112–118 (1991).
  17. Krasikov N, Takaesu N, Hassold T, Knops JF, Finley WH, et al: Molecular and cytogenetic investigation of complex tissue-specific duplication and loss of chromosome 21 in a child with a monosomy 21 phenotype. Am J Med Genet 43:554–560 (1992).
  18. Lindstrand A, Malmgren H, Sahlen S, Schoumans J, Nordgren A, et al: Detailed molecular and clinical characterization of three patients with 21q deletions. Clin Genet 77:145–154 (2010).
  19. Lyle R, Bena F, Gagos S, Gehrig C, Lopez G, et al: Genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial trisomy and partial monosomy chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 17:454–466 (2009).
  20. Matsui I, Yamamoto Y, Kuroki Y: Down’s syndrome and its countertype (21q-). Nippon Rinsho Suppl:1452–1453 (1978).
  21. Matsumoto N, Ohashi H, Tsukahara M, Kim KC, Soeda E, et al: Possible narrowed assignment of the loci of monosomy 21-associated microcephaly and intrauterine growth retardation to a 1.2-Mb segment at 21q22.2. Am J Hum Genet 60:997–999 (1997).
  22. Miller AC, Rashid RM, Muraskas JK: A novel presentation of a rare chromosome 21q22.2 deletion. Clin Dysmorphol 18:57–58 (2009).
  23. Møller RS, Kubart S, Hoeltzenbein M, Heye B, Vogel I, et al: Truncation of the Down syndrome candidate gene DYRK1A in two unrelated patients with microcephaly. Am J Hum Genet 82:1165–1170 (2008).
  24. Mori MA, Lapunzina P, Delicado A, Nunez G, Rodriguez JI, et al: A prenatally diagnosed patient with full monosomy 21: ultrasound, cytogenetic, clinical, molecular, and necropsy findings. Am J Med Genet A 127A:69–73 (2004).
  25. Nannya Y, Sanada M, Nakazaki K, Hosoya N, Wang L, et al: A robust algorithm for copy number detection using high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. Cancer Res 65:6071–6079 (2005).
  26. Patil N, Cox DR, Bhat D, Faham M, Myers RM, et al: A potassium channel mutation in weaver mice implicates membrane excitability in granule cell differentiation. Nat Genet 11:126–129 (1995).
  27. Pellissier MC, Philip N, Voelckel-Baeteman MA, Mattei MG, Mattei JF: Monosomy 21: a new case confirmed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet75:95–96 (1987).
  28. Pravetoni M, Wickman K: Behavioral characterization of mice lacking GIRK/Kir3 channel subunits. Genes Brain Behav 7:523–531 (2008).
  29. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  30. Shinawi M, Erez A, Shardy DL, Lee B, Naeem R, et al: Syndromic thrombocytopenia and predisposition to acute myelogenous leukemia caused by constitutional microdeletions on chromosome 21q. Blood 112:1042–1047 (2008).
  31. Soler E, Andrieu-Soler CS, De Boer E, Bryne JC, Thongjuea S, et al: The genome-wide dynamics of the binding of Ldb1 complexes during erythroid differentiation. Genes Dev 24:277–289 (2010).
  32. Song WJ, Sternberg LR, Kasten-Sportes C, Keuren ML, Chung SH, et al: Isolation of human and murine homologues of the Drosophila minibrain gene: human homologue maps to 21q22.2 in the Down syndrome ‘critical region’. Genomics 38:331–339 (1996).
  33. Tejedor F, Zhu XR, Kaltenbach E, Ackermann A, Baumann A, et al: minibrain: a new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron 14:287–301 (1995).
  34. Theodoropoulos DS, Cowan JM, Elias ER, Cole C: Physical findings in 21q22 deletion suggest critical region for 21q– phenotype in q22. Am J Med Genet 59:161–163 (1995).
  35. Tuschl K, Fritz B, Herle M, Fonatsch C, Bodamer OA: Trisomy 1q42.3–qter and monosomy 21q22.3-qter associated with ear anomaly, facial dysmorphology, psychomotor retardation, and epilepsy: delineation of a new syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 143A:2065–2069 (2007).
  36. Yamamoto Y, Ogasawara N, Gotoh A, Komiya H, Nakai H, et al: A case of 21q–syndrome with normal SOD-1 activity. Hum Genet 48:321–327 (1979).
  37. Yao G, Chen XN, Flores-Sarnat L, Barlow GM, Palka G, et al: Deletion of chromosome 21 disturbs human brain morphogenesis. Genet Med 8:1–7 (2006).
  38. Yao W, Bethin K, Yang X, Zhong J, Lee WH: Role of the GH/IGF-I axis in the growth retardation of weaver mice. Endocrine 32:227–234 (2007).

Author Contacts

Grazia M.S. Mancini

Department of Clinical Genetics

Erasmus Medical Center, Postbus Box 2040

NL–3000 CA Rotterdam (The Netherlands)

Tel. +31 10 703 6915, Fax +31 10 704 3072, E-Mail g.mancini@erasmusmc.nl


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Received: May 10, 2010
Accepted: July 30, 2010
Published online: September 14, 2010
Issue release date: September 2010

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1661-8769 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-8777 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/MSY


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Bartsch O, Hinkel GK, Petersen MB, Konig U, Bugge M, et al: A large family with subtelomeric translocation t(18;21)(q23;q22.1) and molecular breakpoint in the Down syndrome critical region. Hum Genet 100:669–675 (1997).
  2. Beri-Dexheimer M, Latger-Cannard V, Philippe C, Bonnet C, Chambon P, et al: Clinical phenotype of germline RUNX1 haploinsufficiency: from point mutations to large genomic deletions. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1014– 1018 (2008).
  3. Berto G, Camera P, Fusco C, Imarisio S, Ambrogio C, et al: The Down syndrome critical region protein TTC3 inhibits neuronal differentiation via RhoA and Citron kinase. J Cell Sci 120:1859–1867 (2007).
  4. Brooks AS, Bertoli-Avella AM, Burzynski GM, Breedveld GJ, Osinga J, et al: Homozygous nonsense mutations in KIAA1279 are associated with malformations of the central and enteric nervous systems. Am J Hum Genet 77:120–126 (2005).
  5. Chettouh Z, Croquette MF, Delobel B, Gilgenkrants S, Leonard C, et al: Molecular mapping of 21 features associated with partial monosomy 21: involvement of the APP-SOD1 region. Am J Hum Genet 57:62–71 (1995).
  6. Decipher: https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk/application/
  7. Dobyns WB, Mirzaa G, Christian SL, Petras K, Roseberry J, et al: Consistent chromosome abnormalities identify novel polymicrogyria loci in 1p36.3, 2p16.1–p23.1, 4q21.21–q22.1, 6q26–q27, and 21q2. Am J Med Genet A146A:1637–1654 (2008).
    External Resources
  8. Ehling D, Kennerknecht I, Junge A, Prager B, Exeler R, et al: Mild phenotype in two unrelated patients with a partial deletion of 21q22.2–q22.3 defined by FISH and molecular studies. Am J Med Genet A 131:265–272 (2004).
  9. Ensembl: http://www.ensembl.org/
  10. Fotaki V, Dierssen M, Alcantara S, Martinez S, Marti E, et al: Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Mol Cell Biol 22:6636–6647 (2002).
  11. Fryns JP, D’Hondt F, Goddeeris P, van den Berghe H: Full monosomy 21: a clinically recognizable syndrome? Hum Genet 37:155–159 (1977).
  12. Fujita H, Torii C, Kosaki R, Yamaguchi S, Kudoh J, et al: Microdeletion of the Down syndrome critical region at 21q22. Am J Med Genet A152A:950–953 (2010).
    External Resources
  13. Holbek S, Friedrich U, Brostrom K, Petersen GB: Monosomy for the centromeric and juxtacentromeric region of chromosome 21. Humangenetik24:191–195 (1974).
  14. Huret JL, Leonard C, Chery M, Philippe C, Schafei-Benaissa E, et al: Monosomy 21q: two cases of del(21q) and review of the literature. Clin Genet48:140–147 (1995).
  15. Joosten AM, De Vos S, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, Gaillard JL, et al: Full monosomy 21, prenatally diagnosed by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn 17:271–275 (1997).
  16. Korenberg JR, Kalousek DK, Anneren G, Pulst SM, Hall JG, et al: Deletion of chromosome 21 and normal intelligence: molecular definition of the lesion. Hum Genet 87:112–118 (1991).
  17. Krasikov N, Takaesu N, Hassold T, Knops JF, Finley WH, et al: Molecular and cytogenetic investigation of complex tissue-specific duplication and loss of chromosome 21 in a child with a monosomy 21 phenotype. Am J Med Genet 43:554–560 (1992).
  18. Lindstrand A, Malmgren H, Sahlen S, Schoumans J, Nordgren A, et al: Detailed molecular and clinical characterization of three patients with 21q deletions. Clin Genet 77:145–154 (2010).
  19. Lyle R, Bena F, Gagos S, Gehrig C, Lopez G, et al: Genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial trisomy and partial monosomy chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 17:454–466 (2009).
  20. Matsui I, Yamamoto Y, Kuroki Y: Down’s syndrome and its countertype (21q-). Nippon Rinsho Suppl:1452–1453 (1978).
  21. Matsumoto N, Ohashi H, Tsukahara M, Kim KC, Soeda E, et al: Possible narrowed assignment of the loci of monosomy 21-associated microcephaly and intrauterine growth retardation to a 1.2-Mb segment at 21q22.2. Am J Hum Genet 60:997–999 (1997).
  22. Miller AC, Rashid RM, Muraskas JK: A novel presentation of a rare chromosome 21q22.2 deletion. Clin Dysmorphol 18:57–58 (2009).
  23. Møller RS, Kubart S, Hoeltzenbein M, Heye B, Vogel I, et al: Truncation of the Down syndrome candidate gene DYRK1A in two unrelated patients with microcephaly. Am J Hum Genet 82:1165–1170 (2008).
  24. Mori MA, Lapunzina P, Delicado A, Nunez G, Rodriguez JI, et al: A prenatally diagnosed patient with full monosomy 21: ultrasound, cytogenetic, clinical, molecular, and necropsy findings. Am J Med Genet A 127A:69–73 (2004).
  25. Nannya Y, Sanada M, Nakazaki K, Hosoya N, Wang L, et al: A robust algorithm for copy number detection using high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. Cancer Res 65:6071–6079 (2005).
  26. Patil N, Cox DR, Bhat D, Faham M, Myers RM, et al: A potassium channel mutation in weaver mice implicates membrane excitability in granule cell differentiation. Nat Genet 11:126–129 (1995).
  27. Pellissier MC, Philip N, Voelckel-Baeteman MA, Mattei MG, Mattei JF: Monosomy 21: a new case confirmed by in situ hybridization. Hum Genet75:95–96 (1987).
  28. Pravetoni M, Wickman K: Behavioral characterization of mice lacking GIRK/Kir3 channel subunits. Genes Brain Behav 7:523–531 (2008).
  29. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  30. Shinawi M, Erez A, Shardy DL, Lee B, Naeem R, et al: Syndromic thrombocytopenia and predisposition to acute myelogenous leukemia caused by constitutional microdeletions on chromosome 21q. Blood 112:1042–1047 (2008).
  31. Soler E, Andrieu-Soler CS, De Boer E, Bryne JC, Thongjuea S, et al: The genome-wide dynamics of the binding of Ldb1 complexes during erythroid differentiation. Genes Dev 24:277–289 (2010).
  32. Song WJ, Sternberg LR, Kasten-Sportes C, Keuren ML, Chung SH, et al: Isolation of human and murine homologues of the Drosophila minibrain gene: human homologue maps to 21q22.2 in the Down syndrome ‘critical region’. Genomics 38:331–339 (1996).
  33. Tejedor F, Zhu XR, Kaltenbach E, Ackermann A, Baumann A, et al: minibrain: a new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron 14:287–301 (1995).
  34. Theodoropoulos DS, Cowan JM, Elias ER, Cole C: Physical findings in 21q22 deletion suggest critical region for 21q– phenotype in q22. Am J Med Genet 59:161–163 (1995).
  35. Tuschl K, Fritz B, Herle M, Fonatsch C, Bodamer OA: Trisomy 1q42.3–qter and monosomy 21q22.3-qter associated with ear anomaly, facial dysmorphology, psychomotor retardation, and epilepsy: delineation of a new syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 143A:2065–2069 (2007).
  36. Yamamoto Y, Ogasawara N, Gotoh A, Komiya H, Nakai H, et al: A case of 21q–syndrome with normal SOD-1 activity. Hum Genet 48:321–327 (1979).
  37. Yao G, Chen XN, Flores-Sarnat L, Barlow GM, Palka G, et al: Deletion of chromosome 21 disturbs human brain morphogenesis. Genet Med 8:1–7 (2006).
  38. Yao W, Bethin K, Yang X, Zhong J, Lee WH: Role of the GH/IGF-I axis in the growth retardation of weaver mice. Endocrine 32:227–234 (2007).
Figures
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tables
Thumbnail
Thumbnail