For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
The Myths Surrounding Pre-Exercise Carbohydrate FeedingJeukendrup A.E. · Killer S.C.
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Corresponding Author
Prof. Asker Jeukendrup
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT (UK)
Tel. +44 121 414 4124, Fax +44 121 414 4121, E-Mail A.E.Jeukendrup@bham.ac.uk
Background/Aims: Carbohydrate ingested 30–60 min before exercise may result in hypoglycaemia during exercise, a phenomenon often called rebound or reactive hypoglycaemia. There is considerable confusion regarding pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding with advice that ranges from ‘consume carbohydrate in the hour before exercise’ to ‘avoid carbohydrate in the 60 min prior to exercise’. Methods: We analysed the studies available in the literature to draw conclusions about the use of carbohydrate in the pre-exercise period. Results: Without performing a meta-analysis, it is clear that the risk of reduced performance is minimal as almost all studies point towards unaltered or even improved performance. This is despite the rather large metabolic changes that occur in response to pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding. Conclusion: It can be concluded that advice to avoid carbohydrate feeding in the hour before exercise is unfounded. Nevertheless athletes may develop symptoms similar to those of hypoglycaemia, even though they are rarely linked to actual low glucose concentrations. An individual approach may therefore be necessary to minimize these symptoms even though they do not appear to be related to exercise performance.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
Even textbooks can be confusing when it comes to pre-exercise meals. Advice ranges from ‘ingest carbohydrate in the hour before’ to ‘avoid carbohydrate in the hour before exercise’. Early studies have outlined the metabolic effects of pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding. These include hyperinsulinaemia and hyperglycaemia before exercise followed by a rapid development of hypoglycaemia, high rates of glycogenolysis and a reduction of lipolysis and fat oxidation during exercise. Although these metabolic perturbations can in theory reduce exercise performance, the results of studies have been varied. This review will discuss the development of knowledge in this area from a historical perspective; it will discuss the evidence with regard to the metabolic effects as well as performance effects of pre-exercise glucose ingestion. It will also discuss the potential need for individualization and it will end with recommendations based on the currently available evidence.
The first paper to describe the effects of pre-exercise glucose ingestion was probably a paper by Ove Boje in 1940 . In this paper, it was observed that when glucose was ingested before exercise, blood glucose concentrations dropped during exercise. It was not until the 1970s that this observation was followed up. At that time the importance of muscle and liver glycogen during prolonged exercise was generally recognized. It was thought that providing additional substrate either before or during exercise should improve exercise performance. Ahlborg and Felig  used arteriovenous balance techniques during low-intensity exercise to study the effects of pre-exercise glucose feeding. Their subjects received a large amount of carbohydrate (200 g) 50 min before embarking on 4 h of exercise at 30% VO2max. Several important observations were made. First, arterial glucose and insulin concentrations were high at the start of exercise. Secondly glucose uptake by the exercising legs was 40–100% greater when glucose had been ingested before exercise. Thirdly glycerol concentrations were lower suggesting a suppression of lipolysis and fat metabolism. Similar observations were made by Costill et al. . They observed that ingesting glucose in the 30–45 min before exercise accelerated glycogen breakdown and induced hypoglycaemia during exercise .
The performance effects of pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding were first studied by Foster et al. . They reported reduced endurance capacity (cycling at 80% VO2max to exhaustion) during the glucose trial compared with water. This paper became the basis of a recommendation that would stand for many years, namely: ‘avoid carbohydrate in the hour before exercise’. A couple of years later, Koivisto et al.  published a paper that would become much cited. This paper reinforced the message that carbohydrate was to be avoided in the hour before exercise. In this publication, it was concluded that glucose ingested 45 min before exercise resulted in hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia at the onset of exercise, followed by a rapid development of hypoglycaemia during exercise. It was suggested that these effects could be prevented by using a low glycaemic index (GI) carbohydrate (fructose). In the years to follow, much attention was paid to this phenomenon that became known as reactive hypoglycaemia or rebound hypoglycaemia. It was generally assumed that carbohydrate ingestion prior to exercise would cause hypoglycaemia, suppress fat metabolism, accelerate glycogen breakdown and thus reduce exercise performance.
Since these early studies in the 1970s and early 1980s, large numbers of studies have investigated the effects of pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding on metabolism and performance [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Despite this wealth of information, it is not easy to draw firm conclusions about the effects on metabolism and in particular, the development of hypoglycaemia. The results of all these studies are rather mixed, most likely the results of studies using different types of carbohydrates, different modes of exercise, different intensities of exercise, different subjects (some trained, some untrained) and different timing of carbohydrate intake. Since all of these factors may affect the outcome, this makes it very difficult to compare the results and determine the exact causality of the different effects.
To clarify these results, we performed a systematic series of studies to investigate the effects of pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding [10,12,17,18,19]. All studies had a similar design and only 1 variable was changed at a time (e.g. timing of intake or type of carbohydrate). Each study had a control condition where 75 g of glucose was ingested 45 min prior to exercise. The exercise consisted of 20 min of steady-state exercise at 70% VO2max followed by a performance test (a time trial lasting approximately 40 min). All subjects were trained and hence representative of the main population that the advice would be aimed at. The overall conclusion of these studies was that there is no effect of pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding on performance, even though in some cases hypoglycaemia did develop. Furthermore, there was no relationship between low blood glucose concentrations and performance.
Below we will briefly discuss the metabolic events that are responsible for rebound hypoglycaemia, followed by a discussion of the effects of different amounts of carbohydrate as well as the effects of timing of intake, the type of carbohydrate and the form in which it is ingested.
When carbohydrate is ingested, an insulin response is triggered almost instantly. It has been shown that even an artificial sweetener can result in an insulin response indicating that the carbohydrate ingested is sensed well before the arterial blood glucose concentration rises. Once the carbohydrate is absorbed, insulin is released at an increased rate from the pancreas. Interestingly, the ingested carbohydrate will blunt the hepatic glucose production [20,21]. Insulin will recruit GLUT-4 transporters to the muscle membrane and facilitate glucose uptake. Depending on the type of carbohydrate, the rate of ingestion and individual differences, plasma glucose and insulin concentrations peak 20–40 min after ingestion of a single bolus, whereas glucose uptake is increased as soon as insulin concentrations rise. When exercise is initiated in the presence of high insulin concentrations, muscle glucose uptake will be further increased through an independent calcium-dependent pool of GLUT-4 transporters . The rapid decrease in blood glucose concentration seen in the first 15 min of exercise is the result of this rapid increase in glucose uptake that is not compensated by an increased rate of appearance of glucose. In some cases, hypoglycaemia will develop (blood glucose <3.5 mmol/l). However, in other cases, the glucose concentration will stay above this arbitrary threshold. The symptoms of hypoglycaemia are most likely related to a reduced delivery of glucose to the brain.
There are additional effects of carbohydrate ingestion. As more carbohydrate becomes available to the muscle, glycolysis will be stimulated . This stimulation, in combination with an insulin-induced inhibition of lipolysis in both adipose tissue and muscle, results in a reduction in fat oxidation. The mechanisms of this increased carbohydrate oxidation and concomitant reduction in fat oxidation can be found in more detail in other literature [24,25]. Initially it was thought that the increased glycogenolysis would result in premature glycogen depletion and early onset of fatigue . How- ever, the effect is transient, approximately lasting only for the first 20 min of exercise. Thus, it appears that these relatively small differences in glycogen breakdown have no significant effect on exercise performance.
A study by Short et al.  showed that a higher insulin concentration at the start of exercise, resulting from 75 g carbohydrate ingestion, did not further decrease blood glucose concentrations compared with the ingestion of 22 g of carbohydrate. In agreement, Sherman et al.  did not find significantly different blood glucose responses during exercise when subjects ingested either 78 g or 156 g of a maltodextrin and glucose mixture 60 min before exercise. Despite higher insulin concentrations at the onset of exercise following the ingestion of 156 g compared with 78 g of carbohydrate, blood glucose concentrations in both trials decreased. Similar findings were also obtained by Jentjens et al.  when 25, 75 or 125 g of carbohydrate was ingested 45 min prior to exercise.
Taken together, these studies suggest that the fall in blood glucose concentration during submaximal exercise (62–72% VO2max), following the consumption of a moderate amount of carbohydrate (75 g of carbohydrate) within the hour before exercise, cannot be prevented either by ingesting a smaller (about 22 g) or a larger (more than 155 g) amount of carbohydrate. Furthermore, there appear to be no performance differences when a smaller or a larger amount of carbohydrate is ingested prior to exercise.
Very few studies have directly investigated the effect of timing of carbohydrate intake across a range of times in the immediate pre-exercise period. Moseley et al.  investigated the metabolic response to 75 g of glucose ingested 15, 45 or 75 min before exercise. Plasma glucose concentrations were significantly higher immediately before exercise in the 15 min pre-exercise feeding group compared with the 45 min and 75 min pre-exercise groups. Furthermore, insulin concentrations immediately before exercise were also significantly higher when carbohydrate was consumed 15 min before exercise compared with 45 min before exercise. The lowest insulin concentrations were observed when carbohydrate was ingested 75 min before exercise. Interestingly, differences in plasma glucose concentration disappeared within 10 min of exercise and no significant differences in performance were found. In addition to these findings, Pritchett et al.  studied the effects of a nutrient bar (20 g carbohydrate, 12 g protein and 4.5 g fat) consumed at either 15 or 60 min before exercise. Unlike Moseley et al. , no significant differences were seen in glucose concentrations between groups. It is possible that this was the result of the volume of carbohydrate consumed and its co-ingestion with other nutrients. In accordance with Moseley et al. , the timing of the ingestion of pre-exercise nutrition had no significant effect on exercise performance.
Although research has consistently found clear metabolic differences in response to the timing of pre-exercise carbohydrate ingestion within the hour before exercise, the performance effects have been somewhat equivocal. With the exception of 1 study , research has either found no performance effects [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] or a performance improvement [14,15,16]. Based on current research, it would appear that there is little evidence to suggest avoiding carbohydrate intake in the hour before exercise. Furthermore, the ingestion of carbohydrate during this period may lead to enhanced performance. Therefore, individual experimentation is required to find one’s optimal pre-exercise nutrition routine.
To minimize the risks of hypoglycaemia, carbohydrate can be ingested just prior to exercise (in the last 5 min) or during the warm-up. Brouns et al.  gave a carbohydrate-containing beverage (sucrose, fructose, maltodextrin, or glucose) or a placebo to subjects during a warm-up. This warm-up was followed by a short break and an exercise bout. Results showed that the warm-up and final exercise led to increased catecholamine concentrations and a blunted insulin response. Data also showed that the intake of carbohydrate-containing beverages during a warm-up followed by a small break does not lead to rebound hypoglycaemia, independent of the amount of carbohydrate ingested, but instead increases blood glucose. When carbohydrate is ingested just before exercise (<10 min), exercise will start before the insulin concentration has increased and therefore this timing strategy would provide the carbohydrate but minimize the risk of reactive hypoglycaemia.
The GI is a functional tool used to categorize carbohydrates based on their blood glucose and insulin response to a known food. GI is calculated by the glucose area under the curve during approximately 2 h following ingestion of 50 g carbohydrate compared to a reference food such as glucose or white bread (GI: 100). Carbohydrates are generally categorized into either low (<55), moderate (56–70) or high (70–100) GI carbohydrates . A low GI carbohydrate results in a slow and gradual rise in plasma glucose and insulin whereas a high GI carbohydrate results in a rapid rise in glucose and insulin concentration to peak values, before returning to baseline relatively quickly.
The GI has been widely used by exercise scientists since its introduction in 1984 [30,31] to understand the effects of pre-exercise carbohydrate on both metabolism and exercise performance. Studies confirmed that the ingestion of high GI carbohydrates in the hour before exercise leads to elevated plasma glucose and/or insulin concentrations compared to low GI [15,32] or moderate GI [33,34] carbohydrates. At the onset of exercise however, these high concentrations of plasma glucose have been shown to rapidly decrease to hypoglycaemic levels (<3.5 mmol/l) within just 10–20 min. Although it is often assumed that the reduced glycaemic response of low GI foods is due to a lower rate of appearance of glucose in the circulation, it has also been suggested that this may be due to an earlier postprandial hyperinsulinaemia and an earlier increase in the rate of disappearance of glucose, which attenuated the increase in the plasma glucose concentration .
Hypoglycaemia during exercise has not been observed in all individuals following the intake of high GI carbohydrates [3,11,19,34,36]. It is therefore thought that some individuals may be more susceptible to hypoglycaemia. It was originally proposed that insulin sensitivity may be a determinant of rebound hypoglycaemia ; however, Jentjens et al.  found no relationship between one’s sensitivity to insulin and the prevalence of rebound hypoglycaemia. It is therefore still to be determined which factors contribute to an individual’s susceptibility to rebound hypoglycaemia.
In addition to the more pronounced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses caused by high GI carbohydrates, there is also a trend for increased carbohydrate oxidation during exercise [9,15,38,39]. This occurrence is due to the increased glucose uptake and decreased plasma free fatty acids . Furthermore, data have also shown that the ingestion of low GI carbohydrates 45 min before exercise increases fat oxidation during exercise compared with high GI carbohydrates .
Although it is clear that the GI of a carbohydrate has significant effects on metabolism when consumed before exercise, there is little evidence to suggest that there are any performance effects. Original findings by Thomas et al.  suggested that ingestion of low GI carbohydrates 1 h before exercise could increase time to exhaustion (TTE) by 20 min compared to high GI carbohydrates. Since these initial findings, a multitude of studies have taken place but few have been able to reproduce these results [11,13,32,33,34,39,40]. Very few studies  have shown low GI carbohydrates to improve exercise performance above high GI carbohydrates when consumed approximately 1 h before exercise. Studies which have used cycling time trial performance [11,32,34,40] or TTE [13,33,39] have found no significant differences in performance outcomes.
It is worth noting that when consumed 3 h before exercise, low GI carbohydrates do have the potential to enhance performance. Recent findings have shown significant improvements in both running TTE  and time trial  following ingestion of low GI carbohydrates compared with high GI carbohydrates consumed 3 h before exercise. In these studies, however, no further carbohydrate was ingested in the hour before exercise or during exercise. Most athletes will ingest additional carbohydrate approximately 1 h before exercise begins or may use carbohydrate during exercise and thus the practical relevance of these findings is unknown.
The form of carbohydrates ingested before exercise has also received attention for its potential effects on both metabolism and performance. As well as measuring exercise capacity following the consumption of liquid, semi-solid (gel) or solid forms of carbohydrate, studies have also investigated the effects of form on oxidation rates, glycogen synthesis and gastrointestinal tolerance.
The ingestion of solid food significantly slows gastric emptying, digestion and absorption rates compared with a liquid food . This impacts blood glucose concentration and hence it has therefore been proposed that the intake of solid foods before exercise may be beneficial in providing a slower, more sustained release of glucose into the blood . Interestingly, data from recent studies comparing ingestion of solid versus liquid carbohydrate  and solid versus gel carbohydrate  found no significant differences in blood glucose concentrations between groups. Furthermore, additional research has found no differences in either carbohydrate oxidation rates between solid versus liquid  or liquid versus gel  carbohydrate consumed during exercise. Studies that have investigated performance effects have found no significant differences following pre-exercise ingestion of solid versus liquid  or solid versus gel [34,46] carbohydrates.
To summarize, there appear to be no data to suggest that one particular form of carbohydrate can enhance or reduce exercise performance over and above any other form. In addition to this, it has been shown that there is no difference in glycogen synthesis following liquid or solid carbohydrates [50,51]. It would therefore be advisable to ingest whichever form of carbohydrate best suits the individual athlete, based on the practical issues of consumption and cost-effectiveness of the product. It must be noted that the studies discussed above use solid foods that are high in carbohydrate and low in fat, protein and fibre. It is likely that if the macronutrient composition of the food is very different from the drink that the metabolic effects will also be different.
Exercise intensity affects both glucose uptake by the muscle and endogenous glucose production. In order to maintain plasma glucose concentration during exercise, hepatic glucose output is elevated  to match the increased muscle glucose uptake . During higher-intensity exercise (>80% VO2max), hepatic glucose output may exceed glucose uptake and elevated plasma glucose concentrations are often observed. This in turn could reduce the chances of developing hypoglycaemia. Most pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding studies have been performed at intensities eliciting 70% VO2max. While in some of these studies hypoglycaemia was reported [5,53], in other studies glucose concentration did not decrease markedly [13,38,54]. The results of studies where subjects were asked to exercise at higher intensities (>80% VO2max) are also inconclusive. In some studies, glucose concentration did not change or increased [49,55], while others have reported a decrease in glucose concentration during the first 15 min of exercise [4,8,56]. These studies that investigated the glucose response during low-intensity exercise did not describe the changes in glucose concentration during the first hours of exercise [2,57]. Based on these data, it seems fair to summarize that effects of exercise intensity on the development of hypoglycaemia are inconclusive. It is likely that there are large individual differences in the response to increasing exercise intensities and studies in the literature are difficult to compare because of the methodological issues mentioned above.
From several studies it is clear that hypoglycaemia is highly individual, with some individuals very prone to development and others much more resistant. As discussed above, factors such as the amount of carbohydrate ingested can decrease (or increase) the risk of developing hypoglycaemia. Observations from a number of studies in our lab revealed some interesting observations that have not received a lot of attention in the published literature. From these studies it appeared that some individuals are clearly more prone to develop hypoglycaemia than others. For example, in a study by Moseley et al. , it was observed that when carbohydrate was ingested 75 min before exercise, 5 individuals developed hypoglycaemia, when ingested 45 min before only 3, and when ingested 15 min before only 2 (fig. 1). The 2 subjects who developed hypoglycaemia in the condition that resulted in the lowest prevalence also demonstrated hypoglycaemia in the other conditions. The subjects who developed hypoglycaemia 45 min before exercise also developed hypoglycaemia 75 min before exercise. This seems to indicate that some individuals are more prone to develop hypoglycaemia than others. As mentioned above, we also found that these individual differences could not be explained by differences in glucose tolerance as measured by an oral glucose tolerance test . It is therefore still to be determined which factors contribute to an individual’s susceptibility to develop hypoglycaemia.
An interesting finding of the studies in our lab was that some individuals developed symptoms of hypoglycaemia in all conditions whereas others did not develop these symptoms. Moreover, these symptoms were often reported in the absence of true hypoglycaemia. In contrast, some subjects had extremely low plasma glucose concentration but did not report any symptoms. This finding was not new. In 1979, Foster et al.  reported that the symptoms reported did not match the serum glucose concentrations. For example, 3 subjects reported extreme symptoms of hypoglycaemia just before stopping the ride. The blood glucose concentrations at this point were 3.7, 4.6 and 3.1 mmol/l. This means that only one of these values was low enough to be classified as hypoglycaemia. On the other hand, one subject had a blood glucose value of 2.4 mmol/l at that time point but did not display any symptoms or unusual fatigue. At present, the cause of the symptoms is still unknown but it is clearly not related to a threshold blood glucose concentration. Or if it is, this threshold may be individually determined and cannot be captured by an average value of 3.5 mmol/l.
Based on the currently available evidence there appears to be no reason not to consume carbohydrate before exercise as there do not seem to be any detrimental effects on performance. Individuals prone to developing reactive hypoglycaemia and/or symptoms that are often associated with it can find solutions to avoid it. These solutions could include choosing low GI carbohydrates, ingesting carbohydrate just before exercise or during a warm-up or alternatively, avoiding carbohydrate in the 90 min before exercise altogether.
Asker Jeukendrup’s research has been funded by the Wellcome Trust, Nestec, GSK, Cargill, GSSI, and Unilever. Sophie Killer has nothing to disclose.
Prof. Asker Jeukendrup
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT (UK)
Tel. +44 121 414 4124, Fax +44 121 414 4121, E-Mail A.E.Jeukendrup@bham.ac.uk
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.