
Vol. 44, No. 6, 2001
Free Abstract
Article (References)
Article (PDF 206 KB)
Original Paper
Comparative Analysis of the Prion Protein Open Reading Frame Nucleotide Sequences of Two Wild Ruminants, the Moufflon and Golden Takin
Sung Wook Seoa, Kazuhiro Haraa, Atsutaka Kubosakia, Yukiko Nasua, Takuya Nishimuraa, Keiichi Saekia, Yoshitsugu Matsumotoa, Hideki Endob, Takashi Onoderaa
aDepartment of Molecular Immunology, School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, and bNational Science Museum, Tokyo, Japan
Address of Corresponding Author
Intervirology 2001;44:359-363 (DOI: 10.1159/000050072)
Key Words
- Species barrier
- Wild ruminants
- Open reading frame
- Prion protein
- Scrapie
- Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
Abstract
The prion protein (PrP) nucleotide sequences of two ruminants were determined in order to elucidate the differences in susceptibility to spongiform encephalopathy agents in each species. The nucleotide sequences of PrP coding regions of the moufflon and the golden takin encompassed 771 bp in length. The PrP gene sequences of the golden takin were closely related to those of sheep with one amino acid difference. The PrP gene sequence of the moufflon was identical to that of sheep. The similarities between the PrP genes of these two animals and sheep imply that the species barriers between these animals are small or non-existent. These PrP genes could be used to establish transgenic mice with higher susceptibility to prion-related diseases. Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Sung Wook Seo Department of Molecular Immunology, School of Agricultural and Life Sciences University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657 (Japan) Tel. +81 3 5841 5196, Fax +81 3 5841 8020, E-Mail aonoder@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Article Information
Received: Received: April 23, 2001
Accepted: September 18, 2001
Number of Print Pages : 5
Number of Figures : 4, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 24 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|