
Vol. 60, No. 2, 2005
Free Abstract
Article (References)
Article (PDF 155 KB)
Original Article
Luteal Phase Support in in vitro Fertilization: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Saleema Nosarka, Thinus Kruger, Igno Siebert, Debbie Grové
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa
Address of Corresponding Author
Gynecol Obstet Invest 2005;60:67-74 (DOI: 10.1159/000084546)
Key Words
- Luteal phase support
- In vitro fertilization
- Pregnancy rate, meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine if luteal phase support improves the pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Design: A meta-analysis of randomized trials of luteal phase support was carried out with the main outcome measure being the pregnancy rate per cycle. Results: Fifty-nine trials were evaluated. Eighteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Five main themes were identified: human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) versus progesterone; progesterone versus progesterone and hCG; progesterone versus placebo; hCG versus placebo, and hCG versus progesterone versus no support. Conclusion: Luteal phase support is definitely indicated in IVF treatment cycles. This meta-analysis favored hCG above progesterone as luteal phase support with respect to pregnancy rates. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to determine a definite consensus with respect to the duration of luteal phase support in IVF cycles. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Dr. S. Nosarka Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology PO Box 19081 Tygerberg 7505 (South Africa) Tel. +27 21 938 4661, +27 21 938 9209, Fax +27 21 932 2455, E-Mail hkr@sun.ac.za
Article Information
Received: June 15, 2004
Accepted after revision: October 5, 2004
Published online: March 23, 2005
Number of Print Pages : 8
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 7, Number of References : 28 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|