
Vol. 13, No. 1, 2006
Free Abstract
Article (PDF 91 KB)
Original Article · Originalarbeit
Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study on Psychological Effects of a Treatment with ‘Instrumental Biocommunication’
R. Schneider; H. Walach
Institute for Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology and Samueli Institute Europe, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
Forsch Komplementmed 2006;13:35-40
(DOI: 10.1159/000090480)
Summary
Background and Objective: Computerized systems using
instrumental biocommunication for treatment claim beneficial
health effects. We set out a pilot study to test
whether individuals treated with a program called
QUANTEC® report improvements in well-being, health,
and fulfillment of prerecorded wishes. Materials and
Methods: 34 volunteers from the University Hospital
Freiburg participated in the study. Before treatment,
baseline measures were taken (self-report on wishes,
well-being, and health). Participants were then randomly
and blindly allocated to two groups. In the first treatment
phase of 3 months duration, only half of the participants
were treated (group 1). Upon the end of the first treatment
phase, post-treatment measures were taken. Participants
were then unblinded as to group allocation and
group 2 was treated. Finally, the second post-treatment
measures were taken. Results: Data exploration revealed
that individuals’ need for health improvement and blinding
may be important psychological prerequisites for a
treatment with instrumental biocommunication to be
beneficial. Conlusions: Treatments with QUANTEC may
be accompanied by beneficial health effects. The latter
do not necessarily bear on postulated causative mechanisms
of treatments with instrumental biocommunication
but might instead be purely psychological in nature.
However, there are a number of limitations as to the
quality and quantity of such effects which calls for further
investigation.
Copyright © 2006 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
|
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|