
Vol. 63, No. 1, 2006
Free Abstract
Article (PDF 414 KB)
Original Paper
Production of Weak Elements in Speech – Evidence from F0 Patterns of Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese
Y. Chena; Y. Xub,c
aRadboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands; bUniversity College London,
London, UK; cHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Conn., USA
Phonetica 2006;63:47-75
(DOI: 10.1159/000091406)
Abstract
Many weak elements in speech, such as schwa in English and neutral tone in
Standard Chinese, are commonly assumed to be unspecified or underspecified
phonologically. The surface phonetic values of these elements are assumed to
derive from interpolation between the adjacent phonologically specified elements
or from the spreading of the contextual phonological features. In the present study,
we re-evaluate this view by investigating detailed F0 contours of neutral-tone syllables
in Standard Chinese, which are widely accepted as toneless underlyingly. We
recorded sentences containing 0-3 consecutive neutral-tone syllables at two
speaking rates with two focus conditions. Results of the experiment indicate that
neutral-tone syllables do have a target that is independent of the surrounding
tones, which is likely to be static and mid. Furthermore, the neutral tone is found to
be different from the full lexical tones in the manner with which the underlying
tonal target is implemented: it is slow and ineffective both in overcoming the influence
of the preceding full lexical tone and in approaching its own target. Applying
the recently proposed pitch target approximation model, we conclude that the
neutral tone differs from the other lexical tones in Standard Chinese not only in
terms of its mid target, but also in terms of the weak articulatory strength with
which this target is implemented. Finally, we suggest that this new understanding
is potentially applicable to other weak elements in speech.
Copyright © 2006 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
|
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|