Benefits of a Prehospital Stroke Code System

Vol. 19, No. 2, 2005

Free Abstract Article (Fulltext) Article (PDF 122 KB)

Original Paper

Benefits of a Prehospital Stroke Code System
Robert Belvís^a, Dolores Cocho^a, Joan Martí-Fàbregas^a, Javier Pagonabarraga^a, Aitziber Aleu^a, María Dolores García-Bargo^a, Jordi Pons^a, Eva Coma^b, Fernando García-Alfranca^c, Xavier Jiménez-Fàbrega^c, Josep Lluis Martí-Vilalta^a

^aAcute Stroke Unit of the Department of Neurology,
^bEmergency Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, and
^cBarcelona Emergency Coordinator Service (SCUBSA-061), Barcelona, Spain

Address of Corresponding Author

Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19:96-101 (DOI: 10.1159/000082786)

Key Words

Stroke
Code
Thrombolysis
Delay

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Hospital admission delay is a main limiting factor for effective thrombolytic therapy in stroke patients. We developed a stroke code system for rapid request of emergency transportation to the hospital and a priority availability of the attending neurologist on the patient's arrival at the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Over a 1-year period, a 24-hour telephone hotline between the attending neurologist and the Barcelona public emergency coordination service was established. Priority 1 (P1) was defined as a patient with symptoms suggestive of acute stroke with onset of less than 3 h, in which case immediate transportation service and rapid ED reception was organized. Data from patients in the P1 group (n = 39) and patients without activation of the stroke code (P0) (n = 181) were compared. Results: There were significant differences between P1 and P0 groups in mean time from ED arrival to request for neurologic assessment (4.4 ± 19.5 vs. 194.7 ± 244.9 min, p < 0.001), from arrival to neurologic examination (12.6 ± 21.1 vs. 225.3 ± 258.2 min, p < 0.005), and from arrival to performance of brain CT scan (35.5 ± 34.9 vs.120.3 ± 143.2 min, p < 0.001), and also in the number of patients treated with thrombolytic agents (19 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.003). There were no differences between groups in the time elapsed from stroke onset to ED arrival. Conclusions: Activation of the stroke code was effective in increasing the percentage of patients treated with thrombolytic drugs and also in shortening the delay from ED arrival until neurologic assessment and from ED arrival until brain CT.

Author Contacts

Dr. Robert Belvís
Acute Stroke Unit of the Department of Neurology
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Avda. Sant Antoni M. Claret 167
ES-08025 Barcelona (Spain)
Tel. +34 93 2919049, Fax +34 93 2919275, E-Mail rbelvis@hsp.santpau.es

Article Information

Received: March 5, 2004
Accepted: August 2, 2004
Published online: December 17, 2004
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 41

Medline Abstract (ID 15608433)

Download Citation

Cited In

This journal is part of the first subject package of the Karger

Journal Archive Collection

Information on packages (PDF)
Free sample issues

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.