Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 25, No. 1, 2007   

Free Abstract     Article (References)     Article (PDF 222 KB)     

Paper

Treatment Time and Ultrafiltration Rate Are More Important in Dialysis Prescription than Small Molecule Clearance
Zbylut J. Twardowski

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo., USA

Address of Corresponding Author

Blood Purif 2007;25:90-98 (DOI: 10.1159/000096403)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Dialysis duration
  • Ultrafiltration
  • Sodium profiling
  • Hypotension, intradialytic
  • Hypertension
  • Kt/Vurea
  • Lag phenomenon

 goto top of page Abstract

Chronic hemodialysis sessions, as developed in Seattle in the 1960s, were long procedures with minimal intra- and interdialytic symptoms. Over the next three decades, dialysis duration was shorten to 4, 3, even 2 h in thrice weekly schedules. This method spread rapidly, particularly in the United States, after the National Cooperative Dialysis Study suggested that the time of dialysis is of minor importance as long as urea clearance multiplied by dialysis time and scaled to total body water (Kt/Vurea) equals 0.95-1.0. This number was later increased to 1.3, but the assumption that hemodialysis time is of minimal importance remained unchanged. However, Kt/Vurea measures only the removal of low molecular weight substances and does not consider the removal of larger molecules. Nor does it correlate with the other important function of hemodialysis, namely ultrafiltration. Rapid ultrafiltration is associated with cramps, nausea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, hypotensive episodes during dialysis, and hangover after dialysis; patients remain fluid overloaded with subsequent poor blood pressure control leading to left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and high cardiovascular mortality. Kt/Vurea should be abandoned as a measure of dialysis quality. The formula suggests that it is possible to decrease t as long as K is proportionately increased, but this is not true. Time of dialysis should be adjusted in such a way that patients would not suffer from symptoms related to rapid ultrafiltration, would not have other uremic symptoms and most patients would have blood pressure controlled without antihypertensive drugs.

Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Zbylut J. Twardowski, MD
Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
3300 LeMone Industrial Blvd
Columbia, MO 65201 (USA)
E-Mail Twardowskiz@health.missouri.edu


 goto top of page Article Information

Published online: December 14, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 93

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 17170543)
Download Citation
Cited In



This journal is part of the third subject package of the Karger

Journal Archive Collection

Information on packages (PDF)
Free sample issues


For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel