Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 42, No. 5, 2008  

Free Abstract   Article (References)    Article (PDF 472 KB)     

Original Paper

Effect of Microleakage and Fluoride on Enamel-Dentine Demineralization around Restorations
M.S. Cencia, b, L.M.A. Tenutaa, T. Pereira-Cencia, b, A.A. Del Bel Curya, J.M. ten Cateb, J.A. Curya

aPiracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil;
bAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Address of Corresponding Author

Caries Res 2008;42:369-379 (DOI: 10.1159/000151663)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Biofilm
  • Demineralization
  • Fluoride
  • Marginal gap
  • Microleakage
  • Secondary (recurrent) caries

 goto top of page Abstract

There is no consensus about an association between microleakage and secondary caries, especially considering the presence of fluoride (F) at the tooth/restoration interface. Thus, a randomized, double-blind, crossover study was carried out to evaluate in situ the effect of microleakage on caries around enamel-dentine restorations in the presence of F from dental materials or dentifrice, either alone or in combination. In 4 phases of 14 days each, 14 volunteers wore palatal devices containing dental slabs restored with composite resin (CR) or resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GI). Restorations were made without leakage (L–), following the recommended adhesive procedures, or with leakage (L+), in the absence of adhesive procedures. Plaque-like biofilm (PLB) was left to accumulate on the restored slabs, which were exposed extraorally to a 20% sucrose solution 10×/day. The volunteers used a non-F (NF) or an F (FD) dentifrice 3×/day, depending on the experimental phase. No differences were found between L+ or L– restorations (p > 0.05). Higher demineralization in both enamel and dentine around CR restorations was observed under NF (p < 0.05). F concentration was higher in the fluid of PLB exposed to FD or formed onto GI restoration (p < 0.05). These results suggest that while microleakage does not affect caries development, GI or FD may maintain increased F levels in the PLB, thereby decreasing caries progression.

Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Jaime A. Cury
Piracicaba Dental School
PO Box 52
13414-903 Piracicaba, SP (Brazil)
Tel./Fax +55 19 2106 5302, E-Mail jcury@fop.unicamp.br


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: February 4, 2008
Accepted after revision: July 3, 2008
Published online: August 28, 2008
Number of Print Pages : 11
Number of Figures : 3, Number of Tables : 4, Number of References : 30

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
PubMed ID 18753749
Download Citation
Cited In




For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel