Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 223, No. 1, 2009   

Free Abstract     Article (Fulltext)     Article (PDF 166 KB)     

Original Paper

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Contact versus Peribulbar Anaesthesia in Combined Eye Surgery
Luís E. Pablo, Antonio Ferreras, Susana Pérez-Oliván, Vicente Polo, Francisco M. Honrubia

Department of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain

Address of Corresponding Author

Ophthalmologica 2009;223:60-67 (DOI: 10.1159/000173713)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Phacotrabeculectomy
  • Glaucoma surgery
  • Contact anaesthetic technique
  • Topical anaesthesia

 goto top of page Abstract

Purpose: To compare the combined levels of comfort, the presence of complications and the results of phacotrabeculectomy surgery obtained with 2 different forms of anaesthesia: topical contact anaesthesia and peribulbar injected anaesthesia. Procedures: In total, 120 consecutive patients undergoing phacotrabeculectomy were randomly assigned to each anaesthesia group. The patients were asked to rate their pain level on a 5-point scale at 3 time points during the procedure. Early and late surgical complications and clinical parameters of success were evaluated. Results: Administration of contact anaesthesia was clearly associated with less pain than injection of peribulbar anaesthesia. The amount of pain or discomfort experienced during or following surgery did not differ between the patient groups. No long-term differences in the tensional results were observed between the groups of the study. Conclusion: The application of contact anaesthesia in the phacotrabeculectomy procedure provides a level of comfort and safety that is comparable to that achieved with peribulbar anaesthesia. Likewise, patients that received contact anaesthesia were as comfortable as patients that received the peribulbar injection of anaesthesia, not only during the immediate postoperative period, but also in terms of their tensional results and their visual acuity in the mid and long term.

Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Luis E. Pablo
Department of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital
Paseo Isabel La Católica, 1 y 3
ES-50009 Zaragoza (Spain)
Tel. +34 976 765 558, Fax +34 976 566 234, E-Mail lpablo@unizar.es


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: January 11, 2007
Accepted after revision: April 15, 2007
Published online: November 20, 2008
Number of Print Pages : 8
Number of Figures : 3, Number of Tables : 7, Number of References : 17

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 19023223)
Download Citation







For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel