
Vol. 223, No. 6, 2009
Free Abstract
Article (Fulltext)
Article (PDF 236 KB)
Original Paper
Comparison of Three Different Optical Coherence Tomography Models for Total Macular Thickness Measurements in Healthy Controls
Marcel N. Menkea, Simeon Dabovb, Veit Sturma
aDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; bUniversity of Muenster School of Medicine, Muenster, Germany
Address of Corresponding Author
Ophthalmologica 2009;223:352-356 (DOI: 10.1159/000226600)
Key Words
- Optical coherence tomography
- Macular thickness measurement
Abstract
Background/Aims: Conventional time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become an important diagnostic tool to measure retinal thickness in clinical routine. Recently, different models of high-speed, high-resolution frequency domain OCTs have been introduced by various manufacturers. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 commercially available OCT models for retinal thickness measurements in healthy controls. Methods: OCT scans were performed on 28 healthy eyes with the RTVue-100 FD-OCT (Optovue Inc., USA), the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., USA) and the Stratus OCT 3000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.). Retinal thickness values were calculated and compared between OCT models. Results: Differences in mean retinal thickness measurements between OCT models were statistically significant. Mean retinal thickness measurement with Cirrus OCT, RTVue OCT and with Stratus OCT was 300, 265 and 257 µm, respectively. Conclusion: Measurements with different OCT models lead to significantly different retinal thickness values. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts Marcel N. Menke, MD Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zürich (USZ) Frauenklinikstrasse 24 CH-8091 Zürich (Switzerland) Tel. +41 762 228 845, Fax +41 442 554 354, E-Mail marcel.menke@gmail.com
Article Information
Received: July 9, 2008
Accepted after revision: August 21, 2008
Published online: July 2, 2009
Number of Print Pages : 5
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 16 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|