Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 95, No. 2, 2003   

Free Abstract     Article (Fulltext)     Article (PDF 130 KB)     

Original Paper

Choosing Not to Dialyse: Evaluation of Planned Non-Dialytic Management in a Cohort of Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure
Carolyn Smith, Maria Da Silva-Gane, Shahid Chandna, Paul Warwicker, Roger Greenwood, Ken Farrington

Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK

Address of Corresponding Author

Nephron Clin Pract 2003;95:c40-c46 (DOI: 10.1159/000073708)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • End-stage renal failure
  • Non-dialytic management
  • Palliative care
  • Conservative management
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale score

 goto top of page Abstract

Objectives: To study factors influencing the recommendation for palliative (non-dialytic) treatment in patients approaching end-stage renal failure and to study the subsequent outcome in patients choosing not to dialyse. Design: Cohort study of patients approaching end-stage renal failure who underwent multidisciplinary assessment and counselling about treatment options. Recruitment was over 54 months, and follow-up ranged from 3 to 57 months. Groups were defined on the basis of the therapy option recommended (palliative or renal replacement therapy). Setting: Renal unit in a district general hospital serving a population of about 1.15 million people. Subjects: 321 patients, mean age ± SD 61.5 ± 15.4 years (range: 16-92), 57% male, 30% diabetic. Main Outcome Measures: Survival, place of death (hospital or community). Results: Renal replacement therapy was recommended in 258 patients and palliative therapy in 63 (19.6%). By logistic regression analysis, patients recommended for palliative therapy were more functionally impaired (modified Karnofsky scale), older and more likely to have diabetes. The comorbidity severity score was not an independent predictor. Thirty-four patients eventually died during palliative treatment, 26 of whom died of renal failure. Ten patients recommended for palliative treatment opted for and were treated by dialysis. Median survival after dialysis initiation in these patients (8.3 months) was not significantly longer than survival beyond the putative date of dialysis initiation in palliatively treated patients (6.3 months). 65% of deaths occurring in dialysed patients took place in hospital compared with 27% in palliatively treated patients (p = 0.001). Conclusions: In high-risk, highly dependent patients with renal failure, the decision to dialyse or not has little impact on survival. Dialysis in such patients risks unnecessary medicalisation of death.

Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Dr. Ken Farrington
Renal Unit, Lister Hospital
Coreys Mill Lane
Stevenage, SG1 4AB (UK)
Tel. +44 1438 781 230, Fax +44 1438 781 174, E-Mail ken-farrington@nhs.net


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: December 16, 2002
Accepted: July 13, 2003
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 4, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 17

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 14610329)
Download Citation




For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel