Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 219, No. 5, 2005   

Free Abstract     Article (Fulltext)     Article (PDF 117 KB)     

Original Paper

Deep Sclerectomy versus Punch Trabeculectomy: Effect of Low-Dosage Mitomycin C
Salvatore Cillino, Francesco Di Pace, Alessandra Casuccio, Gaetano Lodato

Istituto di Clinica Oculistica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia

Address of Corresponding Author

Ophthalmologica 2005;219:281-286 (DOI: 10.1159/000086112)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Deep sclerectomy
  • Punch trabeculectomy
  • Mitomycin C
  • Randomized clinical trial

 goto top of page Abstract

Purpose: To compare IOP behavior after deep sclerectomy (DS) and trabeculectomy with the Crozafon-De Laage Punch (TP), using low-dosage intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) in both techniques. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. All patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were scheduled for glaucoma surgery. Forty patients were randomized to undergo either a nonpenetrating DS with MMC (DSMMC) (19 eyes) or a TP with MMC (TPMMC) (21 eyes). Postoperative examinations were performed at the 1st day, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd weeks and the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months. Postoperative complications, number of antiglaucoma medications and the IOP level were checked at each control. Complete success (without antiglaucoma medications) and qualified success (with or without medications) were assessed at two target IOP levels, namely le21 and le17 mm Hg in both groups. Moreover, the success rates at le21 mm Hg target IOP level were compared with those from previous series of patients who had undergone DS without MMC (historical control group). Results: Data from all eyes were available until the 12th month. The mean preoperative IOP ± SD was 29.6 ± 5.8 mm Hg in DSMMC eyes, 28.0 ± 6.0 in TPMMC eyes; the mean IOP at the 1st postoperative day was 12.5 ± 4.2 and 13.9 ± 6.5 mm Hg, while at the endpoint the mean IOP was 14.5 ± 4.0 and 16.1 ± 3.8, respectively, with significant reduction (p < 0.0005) of the preoperative IOP in both groups. Complete success (le21 mm Hg target IOP) in 15 eyes (78.9%) of the DSMMC group and in 15 eyes (71.4%) of the TPMMC group was respectively found, while qualified success was achieved in all the eyes. When a le17 mm Hg target IOP was considered, complete success in 12 eyes (63.1%) and 13 eyes (61.9%), and qualified success in 13 eyes (68.4%) and 15 eyes (71.4%) were found in the DSMMC and TPMMC groups, respectively. No significant intergroup differences were found in terms of success rate. There is no statistical significance in the Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves as for complete and qualified success rate in both surgical groups for a le17 mm Hg target IOP (log rank, p = 0.918 and p = 0.429, respectively). As for the frequency of postoperative complications, hypotony and shallow anterior chamber were significantly more frequent in TPMMC when compared with the DSMMC group. The historical comparison between the DSMMC group and simple DS cases shows no significant difference between the groups, with a mild positive trend in DSMMC when compared with DS eyes. Conclusions: Both techniques, DSMMC and TPMMC, control IOP efficaciously at our endpoint. Our results indicate that low-dosage MMC can be considered a mild enhancement of DS IOP lowering effect without any negative effect on the well-known intra- and postoperative safety of the technique.

Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Prof. Salvatore Cillino
Istituto di Clinica Oculistica, Università di Palermo
Via Liborio Giuffrè 13
IT-90127 Palermo (Italy)
Tel. +39 091 6553904, Fax +39 091 6261438, E-Mail cillino@iol.it


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: April 1, 2004
Accepted after revision: September 21, 2004
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 6, Number of References : 20

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 16123554)
Download Citation
Cited In







For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel