
Vol. 64, No. 4, 2002
Free Abstract
Article (References)
Article (PDF 113 KB)
Original Paper
Preservation of Residual Hearing in Children and Post-Lingually Deafened Adults after Cochlear Implantation: An Initial Study
Henryk Skar y skia, Artur Lorensa, Patrick D'Haeseb, Adam Walkowiaka, Anna Piotrowskaa, Lech liwaa, Ilona Andersonb
aInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland; bClinical Research Department, Med-El, Innsbruck, Austria
Address of Corresponding Author
ORL 2002;64:247-253 (DOI: 10.1159/000064134)
Key Words
- Residual hearing
- Cochlear implant
- Med-El
- Soft surgery technique
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the residual hearing of severely hearing-impaired children and adults could be preserved using the soft surgery approach. Patients and Methods: This project employed a prospective study design. All testing and surgery took place in the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland. Twenty-six patients (7 children and 19 post-lingually deafened adults) with residual hearing were assessed. Subjects were assessed using conventional pure-tone audiometry at least 1 month prior to surgery. Cochlear implant surgery with a Med-El Combi 40/40+ standard electrode array was conducted, using the soft surgery approach. Pure-tone audiometry thresholds were re-assessed at least 1 month after surgery. The researchers assessed change in auditory thresholds using pure-tone audiometry to determine preservation of residual hearing. Results: Sixteen of 26 patients (62%) retained their residual hearing within 5 dB HL of pre-operative scores. Only 5 of 26 patients (19%) lost all measurable residual hearing after cochlear implantation. This suggests that surgeons are often able to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implant surgery using the soft surgery technique. Conclusions: Preservation of residual hearing is an important consideration in cochlear implantation in the light of changing selection criteria for cochlear implant candidates, and as younger children are receiving implants. This is important, as we do not know yet the long-term effects of inner ear damage due to traumatic insertions of electrodes. This finding suggests a good prognosis for future possibilities of re-implantation. Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Artur Lorens Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing Ul. Pstrowskiego 1 PL-01-943 Warsaw (Poland) Tel. +48 22 835 6670, Fax +48 22 835 5214, E-Mail artur@prezes.ifps.org.pl
Article Information
Received: Received: September 5, 2001
Accepted: September 20, 2001
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 7, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 16 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|