Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 70, No. 4, 2004   

Free Abstract     Article (References)     Article (PDF 212 KB)     

Original Paper

Subjective Effects of Slow-Release Bupropion versus Caffeine as Determined in a Quasi-Naturalistic Setting
Gerald Zerniga, Harriet De Witb, Stefan Telsera, Matthias Nienhusmeiera, Gudrun Wakonigga, Katja Sturma, Iris Bergera, Georg Kemmlera, Alois Sariaa

aDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria;
bDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., USA

Address of Corresponding Author

Pharmacology 2004;70:206-215 (DOI: 10.1159/000075550)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Bupropion
  • Zyban®
  • Caffeine
  • Subjective effects
  • Visual analog scale
  • Patient-to-treatment matching
  • Smokers

 goto top of page Abstract

Bupropion (BUP), which in its slow-release formulation (Zyban®) is used as a smoking-cessation drug, increases dopamine overflow in the nucleus accumbens and serves as a reinforcer in animal experiments, both suggesting that BUP may possess some abuse liability. The present study examined if BUP produced subjective effects indicative of abuse liability in a quasi-naturalistic setting, with caffeine (CAF) serving as a positive control. In a randomized double-blind crossover design, male smokers (n = 50) ingested two doses (interdosing interval, 6 h) of placebo (PLC), 178 mg CAF, or 150 mg slow-release BUP in their normal mid-week work environment. They completed questionnaires administered by telephone at regular intervals. CAF significantly increased ratings of 'pleasant effects' (p = 0.008) and 'high' (p = 0.03), whereas BUP produced a 'high' of only very moderate size (p = 0.02). In 3 subjects each, BUP or CAF produced ratings of 'pleasant effects' that were >9-fold higher than those for PLC. Finally, BUP increased the number of cigarettes smoked by 29% (i.e., from 24 to 31 per day; p = 0.004) only in those subjects who were unable to report any effect of either BUP or CAF. CAF had no effect on cigarette consumption. These findings suggest that BUP, like CAF, might be of some abuse liability in a small subgroup of smokers (i.e., 6% each of the present sample), and it may transiently increase, rather than decrease, smoking during early phases of treatment in continuing smokers.

Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Dr. Gerald Zernig
Division of Neurochemistry, Department of Psychiatry
University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35
AT-6020 Innsbruck (Austria)
Tel. +43 699 1714 1714, Fax +43 512 5045 866, E-Mail gerald.zernig@uibk.ac.at


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: September 9, 2003
Accepted after revision: October 1, 2003
Number of Print Pages : 10
Number of Figures : 4, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 27

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 15001822)
Download Citation



This journal is part of the second subject package of the Karger

Journal Archive Collection

Information on packages (PDF)
Free sample issues


For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel