Address of Corresponding Author

Med Princ Pract 2005;14:151-154 (DOI: 10.1159/000084631)

  Key Words

• Thwaites' diagnostic score
• Tuberculous meningitis
• Viral meningitis

  Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the applicability of Thwaites' diagnostic criteria in order to differentiate tuberculous from bacterial meningitis. Material and Methods: The study was done retrospectively in HIV-negative patients (n = 126) with meningitis. Of the 126 patients, 103 had bacterial meningitis and 23 patients had tuberculous meningitis. The diagnosis was confirmed microbiologically in 59 and 12 patients with bacterial and tuberculous meningitis, respectively. The prediction of tuberculous meningitis was determined by Thwaites' diagnostic scoring using parameters such as age, history of illness, white blood cell count, total cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white cell count and the percent of neutrophils in CSF. The diagnostic value of the model was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The sensitivity and the specificity of Thwaites' diagnostic scoring were 95.6% (22/23) and 70.8% (73/103), respectively. In microbiologically proven cases the sensitivity and the specificity were 91.7% (11/12), 79.7% (57/59), respectively. The area under the ROC curve value for the diagnostic scoring was 0.92. Conclusions: Thwaites' diagnostic score was found to be helpful in differential diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis, however, the usefulness of diagnostic scoring should be validated in large series especially in patients with viral meningitis and low CSF glucose levels.

Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel

  References

1.

Quagliarello V, Scheld WM: Bacterial meningitis: Pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and progress. N Engl J Med 1992;17;327:864-872.

2.

Aronin SI: Bacterial meningitis: Principles and practical aspects of therapy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2000;2:337-344.

3.

Sinner SW, Tunkel AR: Approach to the diagnosis and management of tuberculous meningitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2002;4:324-331.

4.

Thomas KE, Hasbun R, Jekel J, Quagliarello VJ: The diagnostic accuracy of Kernig's sign, Brudzinski's sign, and nuchal rigidity in adults with suspected meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:46-52.

5.

Thwaites GE, Chau TTH, Stepniewska K, Phu NH, Chuong LV, Sinh DX, White NJ, Parry CM, Farrar JJ: Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features. Lancet 2002;360:1287-1292.

6.

Weinstein L: Bacterial meningitis: Specific etiologic diagnosis on the basis of distinctive epidemiologic, pathogenetic, and clinical features. Med Clin North Am 1985;69:219-229.

  Author Contacts

Mustafa Sunbul, MD
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Ondokuz Mayis University, School of Medicine
TR-55139 Samsun (Turkey)
Tel. +90 362 4576000/2722, Fax +90 362 4576041, E-Mail msunbul@omu.edu.tr

  Article Information

Received: July 29, 2003
Revised: October 25, 2003
Number of Print Pages : 4
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 6

  Publication Details

Medical Principles and Practice (International Journal of the Kuwait University Health Sciences Centre)

Vol. 14, No. 3, Year 2005 (Cover Date: May-June 2005)

Journal Editor: Al Awadi, F. (Kuwait)
ISSN: 1011-7571 (print), 1423-0151 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/mpp

  Drug Dosage / Copyright

Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.