
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2002
Article (Fulltext)
Article (PDF 49 KB)
Thematic Review Series A Vaccine for Nicotine Dependence: Targeting the Drug Rather than the Brain Paul Pentela, David Malinb aHennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn., and bUniversity of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, Tex., USA Address of Corresponding Author Respiration 2002;69:193-197 (DOI: 10.1159/000063617)
Key Words - Nicotine
- Tobacco
- Smoking
- Vaccine
- Immunization
Abstract Nicotine is the principal addictive component of tobacco. Vaccination of rats against nicotine elicits the production of nicotine-specific antibodies which can bind and sequester nicotine in serum and extracellular fluid, reduce nicotine distribution to brain, and reduce many of nicotine’s physiologic and behavioral effects. Vaccination reduces the distribution to brain of both a single nicotine dose and chronic nicotine infusion at rates approximating cigarette smoking. The passive transfer of nicotine-specific antibodies (from vaccinated rabbits) into rats attenuates numerous actions of nicotine: increases in blood pressure and locomotor activity, the induction of nicotine dependence, the relief of nicotine withdrawal by subsequent nicotine and the stimulus properties that allow rats to discriminate a nicotine from a saline injection. Vaccination of rats against nicotine also reduces nicotine-induced dopamine release in the reward pathway of the brain and the reinstatement of nicotine responding, a model for relapse. Because nicotine vaccines target the drug rather than the brain, and the antibodies themselves do not cross the blood-brain barrier, immunization should circumvent the central nervous system side effects that limit the usable dosage of other medications for tobacco dependence. Nicotine vaccines have not yet been tested in humans. The effects of these vaccines in rats are highly dependent upon the concentration of antibody in serum, and are more often partial than complete. If effective for treating tobacco dependence in humans, vaccination will likely benefit from concurrent use of counseling (as is the case with other medications for smoking cessation) and perhaps from its combination with other medications that act via different mechanisms. Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts Paul Pentel, MD Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Hennepin County Medical Center University of Minnesota, 701 Park Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 (USA) Tel. +1 617 347 6426 Fax +1 612 904 4366, E-Mail ppentel@hcmc.org or pente001@umn.edu
Article Information Previous articles in this series:1. Balfour DJK: The neurobiology of tobacco dependence: A commentary. Respiration 2002;69:7–11.2. Etter J-F: Using new information technology to treat tobacco dependence. Respiration 2002;69:111–114. Number of Print Pages : 5 Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 19 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
| |