
Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005
Free Abstract
Article (References)
Article (PDF 231 KB)
Research Report
Eyes Wide Shut? - A Conceptual and Empirical Critique of Methadone Maintenance Treatment
Benedikt Fischera, b, Jürgen Rehma, b,c, Gregory Kima, b, Maritt Kirstb
aUniversity of Toronto, bCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; cAddiction Research Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
Address of Corresponding Author
Eur Addict Res 2005;11:1-14 (DOI: 10.1159/000081410)
Key Words
- Opioid dependence
- Methadone maintenance treatment
- Treatment evaluation
- Quality of life
- Self-medication
Abstract
Background: Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been the 'gold standard' pharmacotherapy treatment for illicit opioid dependence for over 30 years. It has been widely evaluated, and is generally claimed to be 'effective'. Methods: The objective of this paper is to review the rationale of MMT as an intervention for a biomedical disorder with primary social objectives as well as the methodological quality and evidence of MMT outcome research. Data sources included opioid dependence treatment practice, review and outcome research literature (1965-2001) in the form of peer-reviewed articles, books, monographs and reports that are preeminently cited and reviewed international studies on MMT. Results/Data Synthesis: Rigorous and appropriate evaluation (i.e., RCTs, intent-to-treat, patient-centered) methods in MMT evaluations are rare. Evidence of MMT's effectiveness on primary treatment objectives is mixed and appears to be largely partial and short-term. Positive outcomes may be the result of selection effects of compliant patients and loss in proportion when more rigorous standards of analysis are applied. Conclusions: The quality of existing MMT research, and evidence for its general effectiveness are limited. Key concepts of self-medication and psychiatric comorbidity are largely ignored in MMT treatment and research frameworks, although they may serve to explain MMT's limited treatment success. Emerging new opioid pharmacotherapies require the fundamental review of the existing MMT paradigm as well as the application of rigorous and appropriate evaluation methods for future treatment. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Benedikt Fischer, PhD Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto McMurrich Bldg., 109C, Toronto, Ont., M5S 1A8 (Canada) Tel. +1 416 535 8501, Fax +1 416 260 4156 E-Mail benedikt.fischer@utoronto.ca
Article Information
Number of Print Pages : 14
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 92 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|