
Vol. 11, No. 2, 2005
Free Abstract
Article (References)
Article (PDF 191 KB)
Research Report
Pharmacological Relapse Prevention of Alcoholism: Clinical Predictors of Outcome
Falk Kiefer, Hauke Helwig, Timo Tarnaske, Christian Otte, Holger Jahn, Klaus Wiedemann
aDepartment of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg; bDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Address of Corresponding Author
Eur Addict Res 2005;11:83-91 (DOI: 10.1159/000083037)
Key Words
- Alcohol
- Acamprosate
- Naltrexone
- Craving
- Relapse
- Cloninger
- Lesch
Abstract
Objective: The efficacy of pharmacological relapse prevention in alcoholism with acamprosate and naltrexone has been supported by several controlled trials. It remains uncertain whether any differential indication for treatment exists. Methods: We evaluated outcome data of a controlled trial on acamprosate and naltrexone in patients with low vs. high baseline somatic distress, depression and anxiety (Symptom Checklist-90, SCL-90), low vs. high baseline craving, and according to typological differentiation as proposed by Cloninger and Lesch. These variables have previously been suggested to be predictors of outcome. Results: Comparing the course of abstinence rates, acamprosate was mainly efficacious in patients with low baseline somatic distress, whereas naltrexone was effective especially in patients with high baseline depression. Baseline craving showed no predictive value. Pharmacological treatment was efficacious in type II alcoholics according to Cloninger. Applying Lesch's typological differentiation, acamprosate was shown to be mainly effective in type I, whereas naltrexone revealed best treatment effects in type III and IV. Conclusion: The study supports the hypothesis that different subgroups of alcohol dependent subjects might benefit from a differential treatment with either naltrexone or acamprosate. Baseline psychopathology and especially typological differentiation might be useful in matching patients to distinct pharmacotherapeutic interventions. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
Author Contacts
Dr. Falk Kiefer Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), University of Heidelberg J5, DE-68159 Mannheim (Germany) Tel +49 621 1703 3502, Fax +49 621 1703 3505, E-Mail kiefer@zi-mannheim.de
Article Information
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 40 |
|

|

For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service. |
|
|