Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 23, No. 1-2, 2006   

Free Abstract     Article (Fulltext)     Article (PDF 246 KB)     

Review

Surgery for Obesity: Panacea or Pandora's Box?
Rahul Pannalaa, Mark Kiddb, Irvin M. Modlinb

aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale University, Bridgeport, Conn., and
bDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA

Address of Corresponding Author

Dig Surg 2006;23:1-11 (DOI: 10.1159/000092800)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Obesity, surgery
  • Bariatric surgery

 goto top of page Abstract

Background: Given the increasing prevalence of obesity, healthcare providers should be cognizant of various non-operative (diet, exercise, behavior therapy, and medications) and operative obesity treatments. This review critically evaluates these treatments, especially bariatric surgeries. Methods: Medline analyses using a combination of the following terms: obesity, bariatric surgery, and outcomes were performed with particular emphasis on prospective studies and randomized trials. Results: Non-operative treatments result in modest sustained weight loss (5-8%) at one year. Surgery is recommended for those with BMI >40 or >35 with comorbidities. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, a restrictive procedure, causes 35-54% excess weight loss (EWL) at 1 year. Malabsorptive procedures (biliopancreatic diversions with and without duodenal switch) induce 72-77% EWL but are only performed at few centers. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, acting through a combination of restriction and malabsorption, results in 69% EWL at 1 year and 49% at 14 years. Each procedure is associated with unique anatomic and nutritional complications. Overall, operative treatment improves comorbidities and may improve all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Surgery is an effective long-term treatment for selected obese patients who have failed other treatments. Further research is needed on prospective comparisons of procedures, evaluation of long-term outcomes, especially between centers and increasingly unrealistic patient expectations.

Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Irvin M. Modlin, MD, PhD, FRCS
Yale University School of Medicine
POB 208062, New Haven, CT 06520 (USA)
Tel. +1 203 785 5429, Fax +1 203 737 4067
E-Mail imodlin@optonline.net


 goto top of page Article Information

Published online: April 20, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 11
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 100

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 16636549)
Download Citation
Cited In



This journal is part of the third subject package of the Karger

Journal Archive Collection

Information on packages (PDF)
Free sample issues


Case Reports in Gastroenterology


For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel