Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 142, No. 1, 2007   

Free Abstract     Article (Fulltext)     Article (PDF 172 KB)     

Original Paper

Safety of Meloxicam in Aspirin-Hypersensitive Patients with Asthma and/or Nasal Polyps
A Challenge-Proven Study
Sevim Bavbeka, A. Berna Dursuna, Engin Dursunb, Adil Eryinodotlmazb, Zeynep Minodotsinodotrlinodotgila

aDepartment of Allergic Diseases, Ankara University School of Medicine, and
bThird Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey

Address of Corresponding Author

Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007;142:64-69 (DOI: 10.1159/000096000)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Aspirin hypersensitivity
  • Aspirin provocation test
  • Asthma
  • Meloxicam
  • Nasal polyposis

 goto top of page Abstract

Background: The anti-inflammatory actions of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are thought to be due to inhibition of COX-2, whereas the side effects such as gastric damage and aspirin-induced asthma are mediated through inhibition of COX-1. Therefore, a new class of drugs with COX-2 selectivity may be well tolerated by patients with ASA/NSAIDs hypersensitivity. Objective: We investigated whether subjects with asthma and/or nasal polyps (NP) and analgesic intolerance proven by oral ASA provocation test tolerated the selective COX-2 inhibitor, meloxicam. Methods: All subjects were first challenged with ASA using a 2-day, single-blind, placebo-controlled oral provocation test. Thereafter, the subjects showing positive response to ASA provocation underwent a single-blind, placebo-controlled challenge with a cumulative dose of 7.5 mg of meloxicam on 2 separate days. One and three fourths of the divided doses of placebo and the active drug were given at 1-hour intervals. Clinical symptoms, lung function, and blood pressure were monitored during these challenge protocols. Results: Twenty-one patients with asthma and/or NP (10 males and 11 females; mean age: 38.4 ± 2.9 years) who reacted to ASA challenges were enrolled in the study. Response to ASA provocation was rhinitis + bronchospasm in 13, and extrabronchial reactions in 8 (isolated rhinitis in 3) patients. Mean PD20 was 163.4 ± 39.9 mg ASA among patients who reacted with bronchospasm to ASA. Only 1 patient reacted to meloxicam challenge at a cumulative dose of 7.5 mg. Conclusion: This study indicates that 7.5 mg of meloxicam is a safe alternative treatment for ASA-hypersensitive asthma and/or NP patients with proven hypersensitivity via oral ASA challenges.

Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Correspondence to: Prof. Sevim Bavbek
Angora Evleri, Buluscedilmalar cad. C1-2A
Beysukent-Ankara (Turkey)
Tel. +90 312 352 3920, Fax +90 312 319 0046
E-Mail bavbek@medicine.ankara.edu.tr


 goto top of page Article Information

Received: December 19, 2005
Accepted after revision: April 20, 2006
Published online: October 2, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 34

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 17016059)
Download Citation



This journal is part of the fourth subject package of the Karger

Journal Archive Collection

Information on packages (PDF)
Free sample issues


For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.




copyright  © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel