Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo






Vol. 71, No. 5, 2009   

Free Abstract     Article (References)     Article (PDF 404 KB)     

Original Paper

Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation with Mastoidal Three-Layer Flap Technique
Tuncay Uluga, Aysenur Meric Tekerb

aOtolaryngology Department, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, and
bOtolaryngology Department, Vakif Gureba Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Address of Corresponding Author

ORL 2009;71:292-298 (DOI: 10.1159/000258680)


 goto top of page Key Words

  • Cochlear implantation
  • Complications
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Sensorineural hearing loss
  • Superficial musculoaponeurotic system
  • Surgical technique

 goto top of page Abstract

Aims: To describe and evaluate a minimally invasive cochlear implantation approach using mastoidal three-layer flap (TLF) technique. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study at a tertiary referral center. The study population comprised 32 males and 16 females, with an age range of 1-51 years. Thirty-nine patients were operated on using the TLF technique and 9 patients were operated on using a classical cochlear implantation technique. The TLF technique was based on using the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) as an additional, strong flap layer. The TLF, with 3 different pedicules, comprised an anteriorly based 4-cm skin flap, a superiorly based temporomastoidal flap, which included the SMAS, and an anteriorly based periostal Palva type flap in the same mastoidal area. Results: No major complications, including flap-wound problems and receiver-stimulator migration or extrusion, were encountered. The mean operation time was 66 min in the TLF population and 92 min in the classical operation population, which shows a statistically significant difference noted in the time of operation (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The TLF cochlear implantation enables complete receiver-stimulator coverage and safe fixation without any additional procedures, while allowing reduced operation time.

Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of page Author Contacts

Tuncay Ulug, MD
Otorhinolaryngology Department
Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University
TR-34390 Capa, Istanbul (Turkey)
Fax +90 21 2234 1551, E-Mail ulugt@ttmail.com


 goto top of page Article Information

Parts of this paper were presented at the 3rd Consensus Meeting on Auditory Implants, June 14-15, 2007, in Marseille, France.

Received: June 5, 2009
Accepted after revision: September 15, 2009
Published online: November 13, 2009
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 6, Number of Tables : 1, Number of References : 20

 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 19923871)
Download Citation




For non-native English speakers and international authors who would like assistance with their writing before submission, we suggest American Journal Experts for their scientific editing service.





copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel