Home

search

Subjectguide
Journals
Books / Serials / Multimedia
Services
Services

Login for Subscribers
Logout

Sitemap
Help
Contacts


Logo







Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007 

View or print article as PDF (155 KB)   
 
Journal Home
Journal Content
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Aims and Scope
Subscriptions
Medline Abstract (ID 17541290)
Medline Related Articles
Download Citation

Original Paper

Consanguineous Marriages and Their Effects on Common Adult Diseases: Studies from an Endogamous Population
Abdulbari Benera, b, Rafat Hussainc, Ahmad S. Teebid

aDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar;
bEvidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;
cSchool of Health, University of New England, Armidale, Australia;
dDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont., Canada

Address of Corresponding Author

Med Princ Pract 2007;16:262-267 (DOI: 10.1159/000102147)


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Consanguinity, diseases
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Population-based study

 goto top of outline Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the extent and nature of consanguinity in the Qatari population and its effects on common adult diseases. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted in urban and semi-urban areas of Qatar between October 2004 and May 2005. The total sample of 1,050 married Qatari females 15 years of age and over were approached for study. The degree of consanguinity between each female and her spouse and the degree of consanguinity between their parents were recorded. Results: Of 1,050 married Qatari females who were approached, 876 agreed to participate in the study, giving an 83.4% response. The rate of consanguinity in the present generation was 51% (95% confidence interval = 47.7-54.4) with a coefficient of inbreeding of 0.023724. The consanguinity rate and coefficient of inbreeding in the current generation were significantly higher than the maternal rate (51.0 vs. 40.3%; p < 0.001; 0.023724 vs. 0.016410 maternal). All types of consanguineous marriages were higher in this generation, particularly first cousins (26.7 vs. 21.4% paternal and 23.1% maternal) and double first cousins (4.3 vs. 2.9% paternal and 0.8% maternal). The current generation of consanguineous parents had a slightly higher risk for most diseases: cancer, mental disorders, heart diseases, gastro-intestinal disorders, hypertension, hearing deficit and diabetes mellitus. All reported diseases were more frequent in consanguineous marriages. Conclusion: The study showed that in a population with a high rate of consanguinity, there is a significant increase in the prevalence of common adult diseases like cancer, mental disorders, heart diseases, gastro-intestinal disorders, hypertension and hearing deficit.

Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of outline References


1.
Al-Awaadi SA, Moussa MA, Naguib KK, Farag TI, Teebi AS, El-Khalifa M, El-Dossary L: Consanguinity among the Kuwait population. Clin Genet 1985;27:483-486. External Resources

2.
Al-Ghazali, LI, Al-Wash R, Abdulrazzaq MY: United Arab Emirates: communities and community genetics. Community Genet 2005;8:186-196. External Resources

3.
Bener A, Zirie M, Al-Rikabi R: Genetics, obesity and environmental risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes. Croat Med J 2005;46:302-307. External Resources

4.
Jaber L, Shohat T, Rotter JI, Shohat M: Consanguinity and common adult diseases in Israeli Arab communities. Am J Med Genet 1997;70:346-348. External Resources

5.
Bittles AH, Grant J, Sullivan SG, Hussain R: Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Ann Hum Biol 2002;29:111-130. External Resources

6.
Bener A, Abdulrazzaq MY, Al-Gazali LI, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T: Consanguinity and associated socio-demographic factors in the United Arab Emirates. Hum Hered 1996;46:256-264. External Resources

7.
Mokhtar MM, Abdel-Fattah M: Major birth defects among infants with Down syndrome in Alexandria, Egypt (1995-2000): trends and risk factors. East Mediterr Health J 2001;7:441-451. External Resources

8.
Khoury SA, Massad D: Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. Am J Med Genet 1992;43:769-775. External Resources

9.
Sueyoshi S, Ohtsuka R: Effects of polygyny and consanguinity on high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35:513-526. External Resources

10.
El-Hazmi MAF, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari AA: Consanguinity among Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 1995;32:623-626. External Resources

11.
Bener A, Al-Ali K: Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: the Qatari population. J Biosoc Sci 2006;38:239-246. External Resources

12.
Bener A, Hussain R: Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20:372-378. External Resources

13.
Jurdi R, Saxena PC: The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriages in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35:1-13. External Resources

14.
Gunaid AA, Hummad NA, Tamim KA: Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. J Biosoc Sci 2004;36:111-121. External Resources

15.
Rajab A, Patton MA: A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Hum Biol 2000;27:321-326. External Resources

16.
Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD: Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol 2004;31:263-269. External Resources

17.
Charlesworth B, Hughes KA: The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits; in Singh RS, Krimbas CB (eds): Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, vol 1.

18.
Ben Arab S, Masmoudi S, Beltaief N, Hachicha S, Ayadi H: Consanguinity and endogamy in Northern Tunisia and its impact on non-syndromic deafness. Genet Epidemiol 2004;27:74-79. External Resources

19.
Bittles AH: Consanguineous marriage and childhood health. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:571-576. External Resources

20.
Wright AF, Hastie ND: Complex genetic diseases: Controversy over the Croesus code. Genome Biol 2001;2:1-8.

21.
Bener A, Denic S, Al-Mazrouei M: Consanguinity and family history of cancer in children with leukaemia and lymphomas. Cancer 2001;92:1-6. External Resources

22.
Emery A: Methodology in medical genetics. An Introduction to Statistical Methods. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1976, p 20.

23.
Khlat M, Khoury M: Inbreeding and diseases: demographic, genetics and epidemiologic perspectives. Epidemiol Rev 1991;13:28-41. External Resources

24.
Tamim H, Khogali M, Beydoun H, Melki I, Yunis K: National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal Network: consanguinity and apnea of prematurity. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:942-946. External Resources

25.
Moynihan L, Houseman M, Newton V, Mueller R, Lench N: DFNB20: a novel locus for autosomal recessive, non-syndromal sensorineural hearing loss maps to chromosome 11q25-qter. Eur J Hum Genet 1999;7:243-246. External Resources

26.
McHale DP, Jackson AP, Campbell DA, Levene MI, Corry P, Woods CG, Lench NJ, Mueller RF, Markham AF: A gene for ataxic cerebral palsy maps to chromosome 9p12-q12. Eur J Hum Genet 1999;8:267-272. External Resources

27.
Roberts JAF, Pembrey ME: Cousin marriage; in Roberts JAF, Pembrey ME (eds): An Introduction to Medical Genetics. New York, Oxford University Press, 1978, p 295.

28.
Devi ARR, Rao NA, Bittles AH: Inbreeding and the incidence of childhood genetic disorders in Karnataka, South India. J Med Genet 1987;24:362-365. External Resources

29.
Al-Abdulkareem AA, Ballal SG: Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. J Community Health 1998;23:75-83. External Resources

30.
Bittles AH, Mason WM, Greene J, Rao NA: Reproductive behaviour and health in consanguineous marriages. Science 1991;252:789-794. External Resources

31.
Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP, Dott B: Parental consanguinity as a cause for increased incidence of birth defects in a study of 238,942 consecutive births. Ann Genet 1999;42:133-139. External Resources

32.
Abdulrazzaq YM, Bener A, Al-Gazali LI, Al-Khayat AI, Micallef R, Gaber T: A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity. Clin Genet 1997;51:167-173. External Resources


 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Prof. Abdulbari Bener, Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology
Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation
Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, PO Box 3050, Doha (Qatar)
Tel. +974 439 3765, Fax +974 439 3769
E-Mail abener@hmc.org.qa or abaribener@hotmail.com


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: June 3, 2006
Revised: September 9, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 32


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Medical Principles and Practice (International Journal of the Kuwait University Health Sciences Centre)

Vol. 16, No. 4, Year 2007 (Cover Date: June 2007)

Journal Editor: Owunwanne, A. (Kuwait)
ISSN: 1011-7571 (print), 1423-0151 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/MPP


 goto top of outline Drug Dosage / Copyright

Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.

   


copyright  © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
  Last update: 31/5/2007