Background: The influence of artificial sweeteners on metabolic diseases is controversial. Artificially sweetened beverages have been associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) but biases and reverse causation have been suspected to have influenced the observed association. In addition, it has been suggested that investigation into the relationship between the frequency and duration of the consumption of packet or tablet artificial sweeteners and T2D risk is necessary. Methods: We used data from 61,440 women in the prospective E3N-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, conducted between 1993 and 2011. We estimated hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of T2D risk associated with both the frequency and the duration of use of artificial sweeteners consumed in packets or tablets. Results: Compared to “never or rare” consumers of artificial sweeteners, those using them “always or almost always” had an increased risk of T2D (HR = 1.83 [95% CI 1.66-2.02] in the multivariate model [MM], HR = 1.33 [95% CI 1.20-1.47] when further adjusted for body mass index, BMI). Women consuming artificial sweeteners in packets or tablets for more than 10 years also had an increased risk of T2D compared to never or rare users (HR = 2.10 [95% CI 1.83-2.40] in the MM and HR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.00-1.33] when adjusted for BMI, respectively). Conclusions: Our data suggest that both a higher frequency and a longer consumption of artificial sweeteners in packets or tablets was associated with T2D risk, independently of major T2D risk factors, but partially mediated by adiposity. A precautionary principle should be applied to the promotion of these products that are still largely recommended as healthy sugar substitutes.

Keywords:
Diabetes, Artificial sweeteners, Risk, Cohort, Epidemiology
1.
Imamura F, O'Connor L, Ye Z, Mursu J, Hayashino Y, et al: Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 2015;351:h3576.
2.
InterAct Consortium, Romaguera D, Norat T, Wark PA, Vergnaud AC, Schulze MB, et al: Consumption of sweet beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in European adults: results from EPIC-InterAct. Diabetologia 2013;56:1520-1530.
3.
Greenwood DC, Threapleton DE, Evans CE, Cleghorn CL, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, et al: Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Nutr 2014;112:725-734.
4.
de Koning L, Malik VS, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB: Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:1321-1327.
5.
Anton SD, Martin CK, Han H, Coulon S, Cefalu WT, Geiselman P, et al: Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 2010;55:37-43.
6.
Garden L, Leonie G, Kim P: Artificial sweeteners and glucose intolerance: a dietitians' perspective. Practical Diabetes 2015;32:73-75.
7.
Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, et al: Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature 2014;514:181-186.
8.
Sylvetsky AC, Rother KI: Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiol Behav 2016;164(pt B):446-450.
9.
Fagherazzi G, Gusto G, Balkau B, Boutron-Ruault MC, Clavel-Chapelon F, Bonnet F: Functional gastrointestinal disorders and incidence of type 2 diabetes: evidence from the E3N-EPIC cohort study. Diabetes Metab 2016;42:178-183.
10.
InterAct Consortium, Romaguera D, Guevara M, et al: Mediterranean diet and type 2 diabetes risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study: the InterAct project. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1913-1918.
11.
van Liere MJ, Lucas F, Clavel F, Slimani N, Villeminot S: Relative validity and reproducibility of a French dietary history questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(suppl 1):S128-S136.
12.
Fagherazzi G, Vilier A, Lajous M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Balkau B, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al: Wine consumption throughout life is inversely associated with type 2 diabetes risk, but only in overweight individuals: results from a large female French cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 2014;29:831-839.
13.
Cottet V, Touvier M, Fournier A, Touillaud MS, Lafay L, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al: Postmenopausal breast cancer risk and dietary patterns in the E3N-EPIC prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1257-1267.
14.
Hampton T, Tracy H: Artificial sweeteners may promote metabolic disorders. JAMA 2014;312:1729.
15.
Fagherazzi G, Vilier A, Saes Sartorelli D, Lajous M, Balkau B, Clavel-Chapelon F: Consumption of artificially and sugar-sweetened beverages and incident type 2 diabetes in the Etude Epidemiologique aupres des femmes de la Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:517-523.
16.
Laverty AA, Magee L, Monteiro CA, Saxena S, Millett C: Sugar and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and adiposity changes: national longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12:137.
17.
de Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB: A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1397-1406.
18.
Swithers SE: Artificial sweeteners are not the answer to childhood obesity. Appetite 2015;93:85-90.
19.
Neiers F, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Briand L: What does diabetes “taste” like? Curr Diab Rep 2016;16:49.
20.
Simon BR, Parlee SD, Learman BS, Mori H, Scheller EL, Cawthorn WP, et al: Artificial sweeteners stimulate adipogenesis and suppress lipolysis independently of sweet taste receptors. J Biol Chem 2013;288:32475-32489.
21.
Nettleton JE, Reimer RA, Shearer J: Reshaping the gut microbiota: Impact of low calorie sweeteners and the link to insulin resistance? Physiol Behav 2016;164(pt B):488-493.
22.
Tehard B, van Liere MJ, Com Nougué C, Clavel-Chapelon F: Anthropometric measurements and body silhouette of women: validity and perception. J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102:1779-1784.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.